Halpern Said Manhattan Federal Judgeship Would Be 'Honor of a Lifetime'
Halpern's session, however, avoided the controversy of the earlier hearing, and the candidates were asked a series of largely noncontroversial questions over the course of about 20 minutes.
October 30, 2019 at 03:17 PM
4 minute read
Collier Halpern & Newberg managing partner Philip Halpern told a U.S. Senate panel Wednesday that it would be the "professional honor of a lifetime" to serve as a federal judge on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The remarks came as the Senate Judiciary Committee considers President Donald Trump's nominees to fill district court vacancies across the country.
Halpern, a graduate of the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, told lawmakers that his confirmation would fulfill a dream that started when he began his legal career clerking for former Southern District Judge Irving Ben Cooper in 1980. At Collier Halpern, he has since gone on to build a practice that focuses primarily on commercial litigation, estates, employment litigation, real estate litigation and securities litigation, according to the firm's website.
"For me, not only is it an honor to be here and to be considered, but it is a lifelong and career-long ambition of mine to serve as a judge in the federal courts," he said in an opening statement to the committee.
"If I'm so lucky as to be confirmed, I can assure you that I will use every day to apply the law as written to the facts presented me," he said.
Halpern was considered alongside Barbara Bailey Jongbloed, a state court judge who Trump nominated to serve on the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, and Bernard Maurice Jones II, a federal magistrate judge selected to serve on the Western District of Oklahoma bench.
The panel followed a hearing for former Nevada Solicitor General Lawrence VanDyke and Southern California federal prosecutor Patrick Bumatay, whose nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had raised political concerns about the American Bar Association's rating system for judicial candidates, as well as the White House's selection of nominees without the approval of home-state senators.
Halpern's session, however, avoided the controversy of the earlier hearing, and the candidates were asked a series of largely noncontroversial questions over the course of about 20 minutes.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, focused on Halpern's work on a 1997 case involving Trump and his hotel companies, and asked whether Halpern would have to recuse himself from any future cases against the president or his family.
Halpern clarified that he had represented then-Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau, who had been accused of malicious prosecution and other torts in that case. Any decisions on whether to recuse as a judge of the Southern District, would be guided by 28 U.S.C. 455, he said.
"That requires me to look at that case, in the circumstance of that case, and discharge my oath and obligation as to whether or not that's something I should recuse myself from," Halpern said.
Responding to a question by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, regarding workplace harassment, Halpern said he would maintain a close working relationship with his staff and follow a "zero tolerance" policy for sexual misconduct or harassment.
"Chambers staff is not that large, and so I intend to be hands-on like I have in these decades of working," he said. "Should I even get a whiff of any kind of inappropriate remark or otherwise, I'll address it directly."
The hearing adjourned without a vote to advance the nominations to the full Senate.
Halpern was nominated last October to fill a seat vacated by U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel, who took senior status in August 2017. Trump renominated him for the position January.
A litigator in White Plains for 30 years, Halpern is admitted to practice law in New York and Connecticut, and regularly appears in the federal and state courts nationwide. According to his law firm bio, he has taken cases to successful verdict in more than a dozen states.
Halpern authored a two-volume book on civil procedure in 2002 and has also authored several articles for the New York State Bar Association and the American Bar Association. He also serves as an adjunct professor at Pace Law School.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250