New Legislation Proposed in NY to Weaken State Defense Against Sexual Harassment Claims
Lawmakers want to do away with a tactic used by the state to claim that sexual harassment claims can only be brought against an employee's direct supervisor, rather than the state itself.
October 31, 2019 at 06:26 PM
3 minute read
Democrats in New York introduced legislation Thursday to expand sexual harassment protections for government workers by attempting to curb a defense sometimes used by the state to have those claims thrown out in court.
Lawmakers want to do away with a tactic used by the state to claim that sexual harassment claims can only be brought against an employee's direct supervisor, rather than the state itself.
The measure is sponsored by Assemblywoman Yuh-Line Niou, D-Manhattan, and state Sen. Andrew Gounardes, D-Brooklyn, both of which were involved in other efforts over the past year to strengthen the state's laws on sexual harassment.
"Our laws still allow exceptions to our protections for certain workers in government," Niou said. "This undermines the progress we have made on rooting out sexual harassment in New York. Victims need to be able to trust our justice system, to feel safe to bring cases forward and seek justice."
As the law is currently written, the state can attempt to avoid liability for sexual harassment claims by arguing that it's not actually the government worker's employer and therefore should not be held to such allegations.
That was the case for Alexis Marquez, who sued the state, among others, over claims that she had been sexually harassed by her former supervisor, acting Supreme Court Justice Douglas Hoffman. Marquez is a former law clerk. Hoffman has denied the allegations in court filings.
But in a later court filing, the state argued that it was immune from Marquez's discrimination claims because it wasn't her employer at the time.
"Plaintiff does not allege any non-conclusory facts that suggest the State of New York was her employer at any time," the filing said.
The bill introduced Thursday would block that defense in the future by stating, clearly, that the state of New York is considered the employer of anyone serving in any of the three branches of state government. That would apply to Marquez, who worked in the judiciary.
It would add one sentence to the state Human Rights Law to make that change, according to the bill text.
"For the purposes of this article, the state of New York shall be considered an employer of any employee or official of the New York state executive, legislature, or judiciary, including persons serving in any judicial capacity, and persons serving on the staff of any elected official in New York state," the bill reads.
Gounardes decried the fact that the state can still claim not to be a government worker's employer in cases involving sexual harassment and said the state shouldn't be let off the hook for that litigation.
"Sexual harassment has been a fact of life in the halls of power in New York State for far too long," Gounardes said. "An exception to sexual harassment laws for elected officials' employees runs completely counter to efforts to root out, combat and deter harassment in government."
Democrats will consider the legislation when they return to Albany for next year's legislative session in January.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250