King & Spalding Enters Fray—With Limits—in Turkish Bank Sanctions-Busting Case
The bank, he said, had refused to accept service, and "has not stipulated to service by any means." A motion for U.S. District Judge Richard Berman's recusal is also expected.
November 04, 2019 at 05:53 PM
3 minute read
King & Spalding has signed on to represent Halkbank for the "limited and special purpose" of challenging an Oct. 15 indictment, which accused the Turkish state-run bank of helping Iran evade U.S. economic sanctions.
In a filing late Monday, King & Spalding partner Andrew Hruska said the case raised the "first impression" issue of whether a federal court in Manhattan could exercise personal jurisdiction over Halkbank, a foreign entity with no physical operations in the United States.
Hruska also said his client would ask U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York to recuse himself from the case, based on unspecified "statements both in and out of the courtroom that call into question the court's impartiality regarding key factual and legal issues relevant to the indictment."
The bank, he said, had refused to accept service, and "has not stipulated to service by any means."
Since resolution of the recusal motion would ultimately decide the judge assigned to the case, Hruska asked that Berman take up that issue first.
"Because this case has been widely publicized and brought in a highly-charged atmosphere between the U.S. and Turkey, it is essential to address reasonable questions regarding the court's impartiality (and appearance of impartiality) and to demonstrate that U.S. courts are fair and neutral arbiters of fact and law," Hruska wrote in a four-page letter.
Monday's filing came as somewhat of an about-face for the King & Spalding, which told Berman last month that it was not authorized to accept service on behalf of Halkbank, despite previously representing the bank in an investigation by the Department of Justice.
But it also staved off, for now, the possibility of sanctions if Halkbank failed to appear for a second court date Tuesday morning, after first blowing off an arraignment last month.
In an order dated Oct. 23, Berman said Halkbank had "willfully and knowingly disobeyed" an initial summons to appear, but nonetheless gave the bank one more chance to comply. Had Halkbank failed to appear again Tuesday, Berman said he would have considered "any appropriate sanctions for knowing and willful noncompliance."
Halkbank is charged in a six-count indictment with fraud, money laundering and sanctions offenses for its "systemic participation" in a massive sanctions-busting scheme to deceive U.S. regulators and foreign banks.
According to the indictment, Halkbank, which is majority-owned by the Turkish government, used a series of money service businesses and front companies in Iran, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates to transfer billions of dollars worth of Iranian oil revenue in violation of prohibitions barring Iran from accessing the U.S. financial system.
Read More:
Turkish Bank Indicted on 6 Counts Stemming From Iran Sanctions-Busting Scheme
Turkish Banker Gets 32-Month Sentence in Iran Sanctions Case
US Asks Judge to Imprison Turkish Banker for Over 15 Years
Former Turkish Bank Exec Guilty of 5 Counts in Iran Sanctions-Busting Case
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
- 2Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 3Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 4K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 5'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250