Ex-Davis Polk Associate Alleges Discrimination, Says He Was Repeatedly Sidelined
In a racial discrimination suit against Davis Polk, former associate Kaloma Cardwell said the firm tried to get him to resign by not giving him interesting work, and finally by not giving him much work at all, before firing him last year.
November 05, 2019 at 12:14 PM
4 minute read
This article has been updated with a statement from Davis Polk.
A black former corporate associate at Davis Polk & Wardwell in New York sued the firm Monday for racial discrimination and retaliation, alleging the firm's leaders denied him opportunities to work on substantive deals and gave him bad performance reviews as a pretext for his 2018 firing.
Kaloma Cardwell, a University of California, Berkeley School of Law grad who joined Davis Polk in its associate class of 2014, claims that, soon after he arrived, he was left off important emails and denied opportunities to advance his career. He was the only black male in his class of over 120 associates, his suit said, which also cites Chambers statistics stating less than 1% of Davis Polk's partners are black.
He said he raised concerns about discrimination he had experienced with senior staff and attorneys at the firm, including former firm chair Thomas Reid, multiple times in his four years there.
A Davis Polk representative defended the firm. "Mr. Cardwell's termination had nothing to do with his race," the firm said in a statement. "He was terminated for legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons. The claims lack merit, and the firm will defend the case vigorously."
In an 86-page complaint filed in Manhattan federal court, Cardwell, who is represented by attorneys David Jeffries and Martin Restituyo, said in 2015, several colleagues praised him as hardworking and competent. But in his official performance review in December 2015, and at subsequent ones, he was given confusing criticisms that couldn't be backed up with examples, Cardwell said.
Around mid-2016, Cardwell said he noticed that he was given less work on the kinds of deals that fill out a lawyer's resume and form the basis for him to advance. Instead, he said, he was stuck with relatively unimportant tasks, such as reviewing a client's indemnity agreements, some of which could have been done by a more junior lawyer. Even that tapered off; by January 2017, he was being given only around two billable hours' worth of work per month, he said.
"The evidence indicates that plaintiff didn't merely slip through so-called cracks in Davis Polk's staffing system; rather, defendants repeatedly dug a hole that would be almost impossible for plaintiff to climb out of," the suit said. "Defendants' decision to not fully or properly staff plaintiff and to increasingly stop communicating with plaintiff during the second half of 2016 cannot be reasonably explained by plaintiff's performance."
Cardwell said the firm was notified in May 2017 that he had hired Outten & Golden to represent him in connection with his discrimination allegations, which prompted him to be assigned to his first M&A deal in eight months. In August 2017, he said, he filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and he received a right-to-sue letter in August 2019.
In February 2018, Caldwell said, he was told by two Davis Polk M&A attorneys that he was being terminated. One of the partners was uncomfortable with the decision to terminate him, saying, "We don't feel good about this. … If I were you, I would be furious and unhappy and bitter." His last day at the firm was Aug. 10, 2018.
The suit includes claims for racial discrimination, retaliation and harassment under federal, state and New York City discrimination laws. It names Davis Polk, Reid and six other current and former partners as defendants.
A representative for Comcast, where Reid is now general counsel and senior executive vice president, didn't immediately return a message for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Trump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250