Cuomo: No New Funding Needed for AG's Office, Prosecutors to Implement Discovery Reform
When asked if he thought the Attorney General's Office and local district attorneys needed more funding to implement those reforms, as they've repeatedly claimed, Cuomo said he didn't buy it. His comments did not sit well with the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, the state's trade group for prosecutors.
November 06, 2019 at 04:08 PM
7 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Tuesday he doesn't think the New York Attorney General's Office and local district attorneys need any more funding than what they currently receive from the state to implement the state's new laws on criminal discovery.
Cuomo made the comments when asked by the New York Law Journal whether he planned to include additional funding for prosecutors in his executive budget proposal in January.
"They've gotten a lot more funding. Everyone always says they want more funding. This year funding is going to be very difficult. We have a big Medicaid problem," Cuomo said. "So, yeah. The answer to everyone's problem is always more money. I get that."
When asked if he thought the Attorney General's Office and local district attorneys needed more funding to implement those reforms, as they've repeatedly claimed, Cuomo said he didn't buy it.
"I think they've gotten additional funding, and they're getting additional funding," Cuomo said. "So, no. I don't think they need more funding."
The Attorney General's Office, which testified just last week before state lawmakers that it would need more than $10 million to implement the new laws, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Cuomo's remarks.
His comments did not sit well with the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, the state's trade group for prosecutors.
Orange County District Attorney David Hoovler, the group's current president, said if the state doesn't provide more funding to implement the state's new laws on criminal discovery, they won't be able to adequately function under the new requirements.
"The governor's unwillingness to appropriate funds for this unfunded mandate will only cause victims to be victimized again when prosecutors are unable to perform the basic functions of their offices," Hoovler said.
Hoovler said if the funding doesn't come from the state, the burden will then be on county budgets. While some areas may be able to foot the bill for those costs, others may be unable to pick up the slack, Hoovler said.
DAASNY has said the cost for implementing the new discovery laws could reach as high as $100 million statewide, though there hasn't been a formal projection.
That funding would primarily be used to upgrade technology for local prosecutors and members of law enforcement, and hire more staff to comply with the changes.
The new laws, which take effect at the beginning of next year, will require prosecutors to exchange information to be used at trial, called discovery, as early as 15 days after a defendant's arraignment, or soon after depending on the circumstances.
District attorneys from around the state, but particularly in counties outside New York City, have said they'll need to hire more staff to comply with the new laws. They've said those individuals would be used to review and compile with discovery before it's sent to the defense.
They've also said funding is needed to upgrade technology among prosecutors and local law enforcement, some of which are still using computers with operating systems from two decades ago. A more uniform system would help them compile discovery faster, they've said.
"This is a labor-intensive process that requires up-to-date secure technology for all parties involved in the process," Hoovler said. "District attorney's offices, police departments, 911 call centers, crime laboratories and many other entities need the tools and staff to be able retrieve, prepare and exchange discovery."
A representative for the Attorney General's Office told members of the state Legislature at a public hearing last week that they would need an immediate infusion of $500,000 to comply with the new laws starting next year, followed by an additional $9.7 million in the future.
That representative, Kate Powers, director of legislative affairs for the Attorney General's Office, said their current level of funding wasn't going to cut it.
"Our office is providing testimony today to say that we strongly support these requests and urge you to account for these needs in the upcoming 2020 budget," Powers said.
When the state Legislature approved the new laws on criminal discovery earlier this year, no additional funding was included for the Attorney General's Office and local district attorneys to implement the new law.
Lawmakers also chose not to boost funding for pretrial services despite an overhaul of the state's bail reform laws. Under the new statute, which was passed with the new discovery laws, most nonviolent and low-level offenders will be released without bail before trial.
Some have argued that the bail reform law will end up saving money for prosecutors, who could then turn around and invest it in compliance with the new discovery laws.
Freeman Klopott, a spokesman for the state Division of Budget, said Tuesday that counties will end up saving money, for example, from the smaller population in jails as a result of the bail law.
He also noted that measures passed in the last state budget will help raise revenue for localities, which could then be used to implement the new criminal justice reforms. The state estimated $160 million will be generated by a new tax on internet sales, for example.
"There is no question resources are available for the implementation of these critical reforms as the state invests more than $300 million to support them and local governments will recognize hundreds of millions of dollars in annual savings from a declining inmate population," Klopott said.
Hoovler rejected that argument, at least for the immediate future.
"It is irresponsible accounting to expect that savings from bail will be realized instantaneously," Hoovler said. "Basic budgeting principles dictate that any savings from shrinking the prison population will not be recognized for years to come."
The new laws are set to take effect at the beginning of next year, shortly before Cuomo is scheduled to release his executive budget proposal. State lawmakers haven't ruled out including more funding for prosecutors in next year's state budget.
Negotiations on the state budget usually begin formally in February, while the spending plan is due at the end of March.
READ MORE:
NY AG's Office Calls for More Funding to Comply With New Criminal Procedure Requirements
Prosecutors Warn of Rough Transition to New Discovery Laws Without More Funding
Cuomo, Lawmakers Announce Deal on State Budget, Criminal Justice Reforms
Attorneys for Assembly Speaker Move to Uphold Prosecutorial Watchdog Panel
Legal Action Won't Be Needed to Expunge Low-Level Marijuana Convictions, Lawmaker Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250