Gordon Caplan Gets Hearing in Bid to Avoid Disbarment Stemming From College-Admissions Scandal
The Appellate Division, First Department held that Caplan's offense qualified as a "serious crime" that warranted immediate suspension, but also granted his request for a hearing as to "why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be made."
November 07, 2019 at 02:50 PM
4 minute read
Gordon Caplan, the former co-chairman of Willkie Farr & Gallagher, will be allowed to make his case for why he should not be disbarred over his role in a nationwide college admissions bribery scandal, a New York state appeals court ruled Thursday.
Caplan pleaded guilty in May to paying a consultant $75,000 to rig his daughter's ACT score and is currently serving a one-month prison sentence on conspiracy and fraud charges. A federal judge in Boston also ordered Caplan to pay a $50,000 fine and do 250 hours of community service as part of his sentence.
Caplan agreed to an interim suspension from the practice of law in New York but is trying to keep open an avenue to reinstatement.
New York law makes disbarment automatic for conviction of a state felony, or a crime "essentially similar" to a state felony, but the state's Judiciary Law does allow Caplan to argue that his actions didn't meet that standard. In August, he and his attorney, Michael Ross, requested a hearing to present mitigating evidence that would weigh against the most severe sanction.
On Thursday, the Appellate Division, First Department held that Caplan's offense qualified as a "serious crime" that warranted immediate suspension, but also granted his request for a hearing as to "why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be made."
The hearing, set to take place before a court-appointed referee, would be held within 90 days of Caplan's release from prison, the appeals court said. All disciplinary proceedings are held in private, and it would ultimately be up to the appellate division to make a final determination on liability and sanctions.
Ross, who is representing Caplan in the disciplinary matter, said his client was the first defendant criminally charged in the scandal to publicly accept responsibility for his actions. Caplan, he said, planned to present evidence of his past good deeds as well as remedial efforts he is taking to show that he would not offend again.
"Mr. Caplan agreed to the interim suspension and looks forward to presenting all the facts to the court so that a fair and appropriate sanction can be imposed on him," Ross said.
Caplan reported Monday to a low-security prison in Pennsylvania, where he is expected to serve out his sentence. He is set to be released no later than Dec. 5.
Caplan was one of about 50 parents implicated in the FBI's "Operation Varsity Blues" investigation, which ensnared actresses Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman, as well as other wealthy and influential parents across the country.
Caplan was arrested by the FBI on March 12 and soon after resigned from Willkie. In his sentencing memo, Caplan said that his home and auto insurance company pulled his coverage and JPMorgan and Citibank have closed his accounts. He said in court that he felt ashamed, and he apologized for "act[ing] as if I believed my wealth and privilege allowed me to ignore the rules that apply to everybody else."
David Lewis, an legal ethics attorney who practices in Manhattan, said the First Department would particularly consider whether Caplan had taken "proactive" measures to remedy his violations. Typically, that could mean taking classes or engaging in community and volunteer work.
However, mitigating evidence is specific to the individual attorney, and a lawyer's case can often be bolstered by taking remedial steps directly related to the underlying conduct. For Kaplan, he said, that could mean working with students or to increase equity and fairness in the standardized testing process.
"There really is no script," said Lewis, of David A Lewis Law. "The more directly related the remedial measures are to the underlying conduct, the more credible it is that the person is sincere in trying to remedy what the underlying conduct was," Caplan said.
In New York, an attorney can be publicly censured, suspended for a period of up to five years or disbarred for up to seven years. There is no permanent disbarment in the state.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-60
- 2California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 3Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 4Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 5Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250