Erie County Clerk Plans Appeal of Decision Tossing Challenge to NY Undocumented Licenses Law
"When I filed this lawsuit, it was based wholly upon the Constitutionality of the law," Kearns said.
November 13, 2019 at 12:31 PM
4 minute read
Erie County Clerk Michael Kearns promised to appeal a federal court decision handed down last week that threw out a challenge to New York's new law allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain driver's licenses.
Kearns' challenge was rejected in a decision handed down by U.S. District Judge Elizabeth Wolford of the Western District of New York. That decision is on track for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
The appeal comes as Rensselaer County Clerk Frank Merola moved this week, in a separate lawsuit out of Albany, for the so-called Green Light Law to be put on hold before it's set to take effect Dec. 14. Arguments are set for early next month.
Wolford, in her decision tossing the suit from Kearns, declined to evaluate the constitutionality of the law, instead dismissing his challenge because he hadn't convinced her he would suffer any harm from the statute taking effect next month.
Kearns, like Merola, has argued that he would be violating federal law if his office agreed to grant driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants. That could put him at risk of criminal charges from federal prosecutors, Kearns has said.
Wolford wrote in her decision last week that Kearns wouldn't know if he was granting a license to an undocumented individual because the law prevents him and his staff from asking applicants about their immigration status.
"Plaintiff has failed to plausibly allege a scenario in which he personally would be on notice of a substantial risk that an individual was in the United States unlawfully and would nonetheless be required to process that individual's driver's license application," Wolford wrote.
Kearns had also challenged whether the law, approved by the state Legislature earlier this year, improperly conflicted with federal immigration statute. He argued that, because immigration law is within the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress, that the new state law was invalid.
Wolford didn't address the constitutionality of the law in her decision. Kearns, in a message to the press Wednesday morning, said he planned to ask the Second Circuit to reconsider his challenge to the law, with a focus on that issue.
"When I filed this lawsuit, it was based wholly upon the Constitutionality of the law," Kearns said. "The arguments by the State of New York and the decision of the Court denied any consideration about whether the law is constitutional when it shields and harbors illegal immigrants."
The Green Light Law, starting next month, will allow undocumented immigrants—and any other resident of New York—to apply for specialized driver's licenses from their local Department of Motor Vehicles offices.
Those licenses aren't the same as what's already given to current applicants in New York, and couldn't be used to board a plane. The document is only intended to allow individuals to legally drive in New York.
While the law was created to benefit undocumented individuals, applicants for the specalized licenses would not be asked about their immigration status. Kearns has claimed that his office has, at times, become aware of that information anyway.
Kearns has said that, despite the decision from Wolford, his office will not be processing applications for licenses under the Green Light Law. That could mean Gov. Andrew Cuomo could, in the future, remove him from office. Cuomo hasn't said what he'll do in that case.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement Wednesday that her office has interpreted the law to be constitutional and will continue to defend it. Rather than conflict with federal immigration law, James said, the measure changes the state's vehicle and traffic laws.
"There is no question that vehicle and traffic laws are within the sovereign powers of each individual state, which is why the District of Columbia and 14 other states have already enacted similar laws," James said.
Papers had not been filed to appeal the decision as of Wednesday morning, but Kearns said he plans to do so imminently, according to a spokeswoman.
READ MORE:
Federal Judge Rejects Challenge to NY Law Allowing Driver's Licenses for Undocumented Immigrants
Judge Rejects Bid to Consolidate Lawsuits Over NY Law Allowing Undocumented Immigrants Licenses
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250