2 Manhattan Attorneys Resign From Bar in Wake of Allegations of Misappropriated Funds
The two name partners of the Mintz Fraade Law Firm in Manhattan have been disbarred amid a disciplinary investigation into allegations that they had misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars in client funds back in 2012.
November 14, 2019 at 04:26 PM
4 minute read
The two name partners of the Mintz Fraade Law Firm in Manhattan have accepted disbarment amid a disciplinary investigation into allegations that they had misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars in client funds in 2012.
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department on Thursday accepted the resignations of Alan Fraade and Frederick M. Mintz and struck both lawyers' names from the role of attorneys licensed to practice in the state of New York.
According to a per curiam opinion, the Attorney Grievance Committee was probing allegations that the two men had "willfully misappropriated" $125,000 while they were retained to represent another attorney, who was serving as the executor of an estate and as trustee of a related trust. Fraade and Mintz were accused of transferring the funds from an estate account into their law firm's escrow accounts and then moved $70,000 to yet another account that was used to pay the firm's operating expenses.
Both said that as of April 2017, a $487,000 balance belonging to the estate and trust were not kept in an attorney trust account, and aggregate funds of $360,000 were held in an account named "The Mintz Fraade Law Firm, P.C.," which they said was "created to be utilized for replenishing the … scrow funds."
Fraade and Mintz said the firm issued a $425,000 check that May to the beneficiaries of the estate and trust and that a remaining balance of $73,000 remained in the firm's escrow account, pending direction from the courts. All funds held in escrow had either been distributed or were available for distribution, they said, according to the opinion.
The ruling said that both Fraade and Mintz agreed that they could not successfully defend themselves against the allegations "based on the facts and circumstances" of the alleged misconduct.
They instead submitted their resignations "freely and voluntarily," knowing that approval would result in a disbarment order, the opinion said.
Fraade and Mintz, who have been admitted to practice law since 1972 and 1960, respectively, said Thursday that "no one was harmed" and that "everyone got what they were owed" in the end.
The former attorneys had asked the First Department to delay their official resignation for 30 days in order to notify their clients and wind down their practice. That request, however, was denied, and the court said the resignations applied retroactively, to July 22.
Fraade said ethical rules would apply to the shuttering of the firm, but declined to comment any further on the proceedings.
Earlier this year, Fraade and Mintz were accused in a lawsuit by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of running a separate scheme with two other attorneys to disguise public sales of stock in the Massachusetts biotech firm PixarBio Corp.
Both men have moved to dismiss that lawsuit and denied acting in concert with the other defendants, Henry Sargent of Connecticut and Joseph J. Tomasek of New Jersey. Patrick Giordano, a licensed real estate agent from Brooklyn, was also implicated in the alleged scheme.
The New York Post in 2017 reported that Fraade had also been sanctioned by a Manhattan federal judge for lying that his client was based in the United Kingdom instead of Brooklyn to avoid a lawsuit over allegedly pirated television content.
Read More:
Gordon Caplan Gets Hearing in Bid to Avoid Disbarment Stemming From College-Admissions Scandal
Former Prosecutors Break Down Giuliani's Legal Problems Over Whistleblower Complaint
Lawyer Previously Suspended 3 Years in Separate Matter Now Disbarred
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250