Malpractice Suit Against Adam Leitman Bailey Moves to Arbitration
The New York real estate law firm reached an agreement with its former client to take their dispute to arbitration, which the law firm said was the proper forum to resolve the matter all along.
November 18, 2019 at 03:42 PM
2 minute read
Adam Leitman Bailey
A legal malpractice suit against the real estate law firm of Adam Leitman Bailey and one of its partners has been moved to arbitration, which is what the firm had been pushing for.
Trucking businessman Maurizio Oppedisano and his companies sued the law firm and partner Colin Kaufman earlier this year after being ordered to pay over $3.8 million to a neighboring lot's owner.
Oppedisano filed a malpractice complaint Oct. 7 seeking $5.5 million, saying he trusted his lawyers to win what should have been an easy case. The law firm defendants, represented by Jeffrey Spiegel of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, disputed Oppedisano's version of events and responded by moving for arbitration, citing an arbitration provision in the retainer agreement.
Oppedisano and his companies were previously represented by another firm, Blodnick, Fazio & Associates, in the underlying property dispute. Kaufman has told the Law Journal that his firm came into the case after the court had already ruled against the clients on liability and that his firm conducted a trial "solely on how much money" the clients would have to pay their adversary.
Since the legal malpractice suit was first filed, a judgment of $5.5 million was entered against Oppedisano and his companies in the underlying case, which they're appealing.
A stipulation of discontinuance was filed Friday in the malpractice suit in New York state court, but Judd Burstein, who represents Oppedisano in both the malpractice case and his appeal of the underlying judgment, said the malpractice matter hasn't been settled. The dispute will continue in arbitration, he said.
Bailey has insisted that Oppedisano's malpractice lawsuit is frivolous. In an email to the Law Journal, he said his firm didn't lose the case and said Oppedisano only sued for malpractice because he owed the firm legal fees.
The malpractice suit, Oppedisano v. Adam Leitman Bailey, 158372/2019, was filed in Manhattan Supreme Court. The underlying case, Oppedisano v. Arnold, 709138/2014, is in Queens County Supreme Court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/11/67/f75a9f5d46b08088f1ca60a48425/karp-clement-barr-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism
4 minute read!['A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options 'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/02/c8/47d457c84e2ba6f1200184b3b2e2/murphy-767x633-1.jpg)
'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
7 minute read![Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1c/0d/58f7b2954e4eb662e95202e9125d/haynes-and-boone-sign-767x633-2.jpg)
Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
- 2Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
- 3Your Communications Are Not Secure! What Legal Professionals Need to Know
- 4Legal Leaders Need To Create A High-Trust Culture
- 5There's a New Chief Judge in Town: Meet the Top Miami Jurist
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250