Mayors in NY Join Call for More State Funding to Implement Criminal Justice Reforms
"This is another unfunded mandate that the villages and cities have to address," said Robert T. Kennedy, the mayor of Freeport in Nassau County and current president of NYCOM.
November 18, 2019 at 04:03 PM
7 minute read
Mayors in New York became the latest round of officials Monday to call on Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Democrats in the state Legislature to provide more funding for localities to comply with the state's new criminal justice laws, which they also asked to be delayed six months.
The New York State Conference of Mayors, or NYCOM, said Monday that, without more funding, their resources will be stretched thin when the laws take effect in January.
"This is another unfunded mandate that the villages and cities have to address," said Robert T. Kennedy, the mayor of Freeport in Nassau County and current president of NYCOM.
It was the first time the state's mayors, in a unified front, have spoken out about the projected financial impact of the new criminal justice laws. County officials have previously voiced the same concerns.
Kennedy, a Democrat, was joined by several other mayors from areas across the state in Albany on Monday to call for more funding, as well as other changes to the state's new criminal justice laws, before they're set to take effect at the start of next year.
Their focus was on the upcoming changes to criminal discovery, or information exchanged between prosecutors and the defense before trial.
The new laws will require prosecutors in New York to hand over discovery to defense attorneys within 15 days of their client's arraignment. Such a deadline was not previously enshrined in state law, leaving some prosecutors to delay discovery until close to trial.
The change is intended to give defendants, and their attorneys, more time to build a case before they're set to go to trial. It would also inform defendants about what information prosecutors have on them and whether a plea deal would make more sense.
But with those changes comes a significant price, mayors said Monday. Kennedy said the bulk of that cost will come from having to hire more police officers.
That's because the state's new laws on criminal discovery will require local police departments to turn over evidence—including documents and digital files—to prosecutors within days of a defendant's arraignment.
Prosecutors have 15 days from an arraignment to deliver that material to the defense, but they have to receive it from local police departments and other entities before they can prepare it for discovery. That means that, to comply, prosecutors need to have it as soon as possible.
For some crimes, that material can be particularly voluminous. It can include the body camera footage from every officer at the scene of a crime, every document pertaining to that case, each audio file involved and other materials.
"I can't hire civilians to do this discovery. I have to hire police officers," Kennedy said. "So, a police officer's going to do that, and they're going to spend hours."
Officers will either have to work overtime to comply with the new law, Kennedy said, or he'll have to hire more police to meet those demands. He's estimated an added cost of $2.2 million for his village alone as a result of the law.
That's partly due to how some of the local laws in Freeport would interact with the new criminal justice measures. Some building violations may require a jail term for failing to comply, for example, which would trigger the discovery requirements, he said.
"Every village is different. You might have more police, you have more building department codes, but what are the effects both financial and logistical?" Kennedy said. "That's a question everybody has to look at."
Richard David, the mayor of Binghamton, said he's in the same boat. He said his city doesn't have the resources it would need to fully comply with the new discovery laws. That means he'll likely have to make changes to his budget at the beginning of next year, he said.
"There are no new revenues coming in, so I'm going to have to change the budget," David said. "It means I'm going to have to make some cuts in some other areas if I need to hire more personnel."
That doesn't mean the state's mayors have taken a position against the new criminal justice laws. David, a Republican, said his issue wasn't as much over the content of the new laws—which also include the elimination of cash bail for most nonviolent and low-level charges.
"The issue is more about the financial impact for municipalities in dealing with the changes, not necessarily the bail reform, because no one should be held for a lengthy period of time for, for example, stealing something from a store," David said.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, the trade group representing the state's prosecutors, has also repeatedly called for more funding from the state to implement the new laws.
Those calls have been met with resistance from Cuomo, who said earlier this month that he doesn't plan to propose new spending for the reforms. A spokesman for the state Division of Budget said Monday that localities have enough funding to support the changes.
"There is no question resources are available for the implementation of these critical reforms as the State invests more than $300 million to support them and local governments will recognize hundreds of millions of dollars in annual savings from a declining inmate population," said Freeman Klopott, the spokesman.
Included in that funding is a new tax on internet sales, which is expected to generate $160 million in new revenue for localities, Klopott said. Kennedy said that money, while welcome, is not guaranteed to front the cost of the new laws.
"We don't know what the [aid for municipalities] funding is going to be," Kennedy said. "We don't know what the income is going to be for the internet sales tax. I hope it's going to be good."
Aside from more funding, NYCOM also pitched a series of changes to the state's new criminal justice laws—including a proposed delay until July.
Also among those proposed changes was a pause on discovery in felony cases until after a defendant is indicted. That would be for cases where an individual is arrested and arraigned but isn't indicted by a grand jury until later. The proposal would essentially stop the clock.
They also proposed eliminating discovery requirements for violations—which would only leave them for misdemeanor and felony charges. Violations, like traffic tickets, would be subject to discovery under the law, prosecutors have said.
Their proposal would also pause discovery requirements for 30 days in cases where defendants attempt to negotiate a plea bargain with prosecutors. They're also seeking to allow information on victims to be withheld without a court order, as would be required under the reforms.
The new laws are set to take effect Jan. 1.
READ MORE:
More Funding Needed for Pretrial Services Ahead of NY Bail Reform, Supporters Say
New Funding for Pretrial Services Agencies Left Out of NY Bail Reform Law
Cuomo: No New Funding Needed for AG's Office, Prosecutors to Implement Discovery Reform
Cuomo, Lawmakers Announce Deal on State Budget, Criminal Justice Reforms
Lawmakers Reshape NY Criminal Justice System, With Varied Reactions From DAs, Defenders
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
- 2States Reach New $7.4B Opioid Deal With Purdue After SCOTUS Ruling
- 3$975,000 Settlement Reached After Fall on Sidewalk
- 4'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
- 5Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250