Trump's Request for Interim Stay Denied by NY Appeals Court in Summer Zervos' Defamation Case
Justice Dianne Renwick of the Manhattan-based New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, also ordered that the Trump's motion for reargument or leave to appeal should be expedited, setting a deadline of Dec. 2.
November 19, 2019 at 11:33 AM
3 minute read
President Donald Trump's application for an interim stay was denied by a New York state appeals court judge Monday evening in a defamation lawsuit filed by Summer Zervos, a former contestant on "The Apprentice" reality-television program.
Justice Dianne Renwick of the Manhattan-based New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, also ordered that Trump's motion for reargument or leave to appeal should be expedited, setting a deadline of Dec. 2 for Zervos' response.
In 2016, Zervos publicly accused Trump of groping and kissing her without her consent during 2007, when she said she was hoping to cultivate a business relationship with the future president.
Trump repeatedly denied the accusation and said Zervos was lying, according to the complaint in her lawsuit, which was filed by Mariann Meier Wang of Cuti Hecker Wang in January 2017.
Trump is set to be deposed in the suit, though the schedule for his deposition has been repeatedly delayed. At the beginning of November, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Jennifer Schecter ordered that by the end of the month, Trump must provide four potential deposition dates on or before Jan. 31.
In Monday's stay application, the president's lawyers at Kasowitz Benson Torres echoed arguments from other cases involving Trump.
"A stay is necessary given the novel and important Constitutional issues involved, the special considerations due the President's request for interlocutory appeals and to prevent irreparable harm," they wrote.
An April motion for a stay was denied in the First Department in May, they noted, arguing that circumstances have evolved since then.
"This was prior to this Court's 3-2 split decision, the long discovery hiatus in the trial court, and the stays granted to the President in similar cases by this Court and the United States Courts of Appeal for the Second, Fourth and D.C. Circuits," they wrote.
A Kasowitz Benson Torres spokeswoman responded with a statement.
"We are pleased that Justice Renwick of the First Department put the President's motion for reargument or leave to appeal on an expedited schedule," the spokeswoman said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPost-Pandemic Increase in Live Events Prompts Need for Premise Liability Action
7 minute readAs Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250