Fast Track Urged for Conflict-of-Interest Inquiry for Chinese Professor Linked to Huawei
While third-party payments for legal counsel are typically reviewed in court, Solomon wrote that this "Curcio" review is particularly necessary because Mao's alleged association with the companies is a key fact of the government's case.
November 21, 2019 at 06:33 PM
3 minute read
Lawyers representing a Chinese professor accused of helping to steal intellectual property for the Chinese telecom giant Huawei told a Brooklyn federal judge Thursday that they want to get conflict-of-interest questions about their fees resolved as quickly as possible.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Alexander Solomon filed a letter this week claiming that the defendant's Thompson & Knight and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati attorneys are being paid by a U.S. subsidiary of "Company 1," which has been identified in multiple media reports as Huawei.
Bo Mao, who was arrested in Texas in August, is accused of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, a conspiracy that allegedly involved Huawei and its subsidiary, according to prosecutors.
While third-party payments for legal counsel are typically reviewed in court, Solomon wrote that this Curcio review is particularly necessary because Mao's alleged association with the companies is a key fact of the government's case.
U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly appointed Garden City attorney John Wallenstein as Curcio counsel for Mao and scheduled the hearing for Dec. 3, though Mao's current attorneys offered to appear as early as next week.
The lawyers, including Michael Sommer of Wilson Sonsini and Richard Roper of Thompson & Knight, said they want to get the issue resolved so they can move forward with discovery in the case.
Sommer said they have not yet seen a copy of the "relatedness letter," which explained why the case is connected to another matter in the Eastern District. Details of that connection have not been made publicly available, and Solomon said in court that the relatedness letter contains grand jury material.
The other case is related to the Curcio inquiry, Donnelly said, because a defendant in that case is paying Mao's legal bills. Donnelly has a case against Huawei on her docket, though she did not say whether that's the case she was referring to.
Donnelly also brought up her own potential conflict of interest in this case, explaining that Sommer and her brother were roommates in college. She invited either side to bring up their concerns about that.
"My feelings, believe me, will not be hurt if I don't have this case," she said with a chuckle.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute readGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readJudge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250