Feds Say New Indictment Is 'Likely' in Campaign-Finance Case Against Giuliani-Linked Defendants
A federal prosecutor in Manhattan said Monday that a new indictment was "likely" in the criminal campaign-finance case against two associates of Rudy Giuliani.
December 02, 2019 at 04:55 PM
4 minute read
An assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York said Monday that a new indictment was "likely" in the criminal campaign-finance case against two associates of Rudy Giuliani.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Douglas Zolkind—answering a question posed by U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York—confirmed that the investigation into defendants Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman remained ongoing, but declined to comment any further in open court.
"We think a superseding indictment is likely, but no decision has been made," Zolkind said. "It's something we're continuing to evaluate."
Attorneys for Parnas and Fruman, meanwhile, said they had not yet seen much of the evidence that had been collected through "voluminous discovery" in the case, which accuses both men, and two other associates, of engaging in a scheme to violate U.S. campaign-finance laws.
According to a four-count indictment, Parnas and Fruman allegedly conspired to funnel foreign money to candidates for state and federal office in order to buy influence among lawmakers and state governments. Both men are former clients of Giuliani, the former New York City mayor who has come under fire recently for his role in alleged efforts by President Donald Trump to have the Ukrainian government interfere in the 2020 U.S. election.
Giuliani has not been charged with any wrongdoing.
Congressional impeachment investigators however are scrutinizing the former New York City mayor's dealings in Ukraine, and, according to reporting of the New York Times, prosecutors in the Southern District have been probing his connections with Parnas and Fruman.
Co-defendants Andrey Kukushkin and David Correia were also charged with one count each of conspiracy in the case.
Zolkind said the government had seized 12 electronic devices from Parnas, including five iPhones, two iPads, a MacBook, a hard drive and two other phones either during his arrest in October or during a later search of his home. Among the devices taken from Fruman were two iPhones, a satellite phone, three thumb drives and a cell phone, Zolkind said.
Prosecutors have also subpoenaed phone, bank and internet records and carried out multiple search warrants for email accounts and electronic devices.
Defense attorneys for the four men, however, decried delays in accessing evidence that the government had collected against their clients, and floated measure to expedite production.
"We have no sense of this case," said attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt, who represents Kukushkin.
"We have no idea how much time its going to take to get through all this stuff," he said.
Zolkind responded that the U.S. Attorney's Office was in the process of scanning paper documents and planned to return them to defense counsel as soon as possible. He also said the government had requested passwords for electronic devices, which would help the process move along more swiftly.
Oetken declined to grant defense requests to speed up production, but noted that the bulk of evidence would be returned to the defendants within 60 days. He set the conference in the case for Feb. 3.
Of the four defendants, only Parnas was present Monday in the courtroom. His attorney, Joseph Bondy, reiterated that his client was planning to comply with the House Judiciary Committee, which had subpoenaed Parnas for documents that were currently in the government's possession.
Zolkind said prosecutors would not object to an order that certain documents be turned over to Congress, and Oetken said he expected to grant the request.
Fruman, Correia and Kukushkin all waived their appearances and were excused from attending Monday's hearing.
Fruman is represented by Todd Blanche of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, and Correia is represented by William Joseph Harrington of Goodwin Procter.
Read More:
Lawyer for Giuliani-Linked Defendant Cites Executive Privilege Issue in Campaign Finance Case
Co-Defendants Plead Not Guilty in Alleged Campaign Finance Scheme Linked to Giuliani Associates
Federal Prosecutors Charge 2 Men With Giuliani Ties in Campaign-Finance Violation Probe
Former Prosecutors Break Down Giuliani's Legal Problems Over Whistleblower Complaint
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 2Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 3Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 4Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 5Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250