Private Equity Fund Manager Accused of Defrauding Investors by NY Attorney General's Office
Allen was sued by the Attorney General's Office under the state's Martin Act, a section of law that affords the office sweeping authority to handle matters of securities fraud.
December 05, 2019 at 07:14 PM
4 minute read
New York State Attorney General Letitia James in April. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
The manager of a private equity fund was accused by the New York Attorney General's Office on Thursday of transferring money from investors to a company he owned to pay his own salary and keep that business from folding.
Laurence Allen, the CEO of NYPPEX Holdings LLC, was the target of a lawsuit from the Attorney General's Office in Manhattan Supreme Court on Thursday over the alleged fraud.
Allen was sued by the Attorney General's Office under the state's Martin Act, a section of law that affords the office sweeping authority to handle matters of securities fraud. The lawsuit also brought common-law claims and claims under the state's executive law.
The New York Attorney General's Office said its investigation into Allen's dealings dates back more than two years.
"This lawsuit highlights the greed and hubris a single individual presented by allegedly using other people's savings as his personal piggy bank and as a tool to prop up his failing businesses," New York Attorney General Letitia James said.
According to the lawsuit, Allen is accused of transferring money from a fund that he managed, called ACP, to NYPPEX to pad his own salary. Between 2008 and 2018, Allen transferred about $5.7 million from ACP to NYPPEX—the same amount he was paid during that time.
That money, according to the New York Attorney General's Office, was initially paid into ACP by investors. The fund was launched to purchase interests in other private funds at a discount.
But the transfers from ACP into NYPPEX were meritless, the lawsuit said. Investors had no prospect of ever earning a return because NYPPEX has continued to lose money over the past decade, the Attorney General's Office said.
Allen is also alleged to have misappropriated $3.4 million in carried interest from ACP and using the fund's money to pay for the daily expenses of NYPPEX. Those actions violated ACP's offering documents, the suit said.
He was also accused of defrauding investors by saying the investments from ACP into NYPPEX had been vetted by a committee that didn't exist. He also took steps to inflate the value of the fund for investors, the lawsuit said.
Leon Borstein, a shareholder at Borstein Turkel in Manhattan who's representing Allen, said he was confident that his client would be successful against the litigation.
"From my view so far in the facts, I don't think they're right in any aspect of their complaint," Borstein said.
He pointed to the evidence against Allen, in terms of fraud, and said the Attorney General's Office had come up short. After reviewing each exhibit accompanying the lawsuit, he said none showed a complaint of fraud from an investor.
"There's no exhibit that they have in their papers that is a complaint by an investor that he or she has been defrauded—not one," Borstein said. "In order to be a fraud, somebody has to say they've been defrauded."
Borstein also argued that the Attorney General's Office may not have standing to bring the litigation because, he claimed, many of the fund's investors were not New York residents.
As part of the state's lawsuit, the Attorney General's Office is seeking restitution, damages and other penalties from Allen. It's also seeking a special receiver to take control of ACP's assets and dissolve the fund without control from Allen.
READ MORE:
New York State Sues Vaping Company Juul Labs Over Allegedly Unlawful Marketing Practices
DFS Proposes New Regulation Streamlining Info-Sharing Between Banks and Their Lawyers
NY Regulator's Lawsuit Derails Federal Push to Charter Fintech Companies
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Judge in AGs' Suit Set to Block 'Chaotic' Trump Funding Freeze Judge in AGs' Suit Set to Block 'Chaotic' Trump Funding Freeze](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/07/3b/f5ca989c4c78b88ca04717405e37/us-district-court-district-of-rhode-island-767x633.jpg)
![Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/05/c1/4b31c175410eb4fb16ae25bb1b8c/bonta-james-platkin-767x633.jpg)
Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute read![Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/20/87/5a6699c749398b101be722b683c3/ap23032746325813-767x633.jpg)
Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute read![Bipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers Bipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/96/93/ef01c99e4bab98928cd1b2581977/54266754699-f929904b4b-o-767x633.jpg)
Bipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250