Private Equity Fund Manager Accused of Defrauding Investors by NY Attorney General's Office
Allen was sued by the Attorney General's Office under the state's Martin Act, a section of law that affords the office sweeping authority to handle matters of securities fraud.
December 05, 2019 at 07:14 PM
4 minute read
The manager of a private equity fund was accused by the New York Attorney General's Office on Thursday of transferring money from investors to a company he owned to pay his own salary and keep that business from folding.
Laurence Allen, the CEO of NYPPEX Holdings LLC, was the target of a lawsuit from the Attorney General's Office in Manhattan Supreme Court on Thursday over the alleged fraud.
Allen was sued by the Attorney General's Office under the state's Martin Act, a section of law that affords the office sweeping authority to handle matters of securities fraud. The lawsuit also brought common-law claims and claims under the state's executive law.
The New York Attorney General's Office said its investigation into Allen's dealings dates back more than two years.
"This lawsuit highlights the greed and hubris a single individual presented by allegedly using other people's savings as his personal piggy bank and as a tool to prop up his failing businesses," New York Attorney General Letitia James said.
According to the lawsuit, Allen is accused of transferring money from a fund that he managed, called ACP, to NYPPEX to pad his own salary. Between 2008 and 2018, Allen transferred about $5.7 million from ACP to NYPPEX—the same amount he was paid during that time.
That money, according to the New York Attorney General's Office, was initially paid into ACP by investors. The fund was launched to purchase interests in other private funds at a discount.
But the transfers from ACP into NYPPEX were meritless, the lawsuit said. Investors had no prospect of ever earning a return because NYPPEX has continued to lose money over the past decade, the Attorney General's Office said.
Allen is also alleged to have misappropriated $3.4 million in carried interest from ACP and using the fund's money to pay for the daily expenses of NYPPEX. Those actions violated ACP's offering documents, the suit said.
He was also accused of defrauding investors by saying the investments from ACP into NYPPEX had been vetted by a committee that didn't exist. He also took steps to inflate the value of the fund for investors, the lawsuit said.
Leon Borstein, a shareholder at Borstein Turkel in Manhattan who's representing Allen, said he was confident that his client would be successful against the litigation.
"From my view so far in the facts, I don't think they're right in any aspect of their complaint," Borstein said.
He pointed to the evidence against Allen, in terms of fraud, and said the Attorney General's Office had come up short. After reviewing each exhibit accompanying the lawsuit, he said none showed a complaint of fraud from an investor.
"There's no exhibit that they have in their papers that is a complaint by an investor that he or she has been defrauded—not one," Borstein said. "In order to be a fraud, somebody has to say they've been defrauded."
Borstein also argued that the Attorney General's Office may not have standing to bring the litigation because, he claimed, many of the fund's investors were not New York residents.
As part of the state's lawsuit, the Attorney General's Office is seeking restitution, damages and other penalties from Allen. It's also seeking a special receiver to take control of ACP's assets and dissolve the fund without control from Allen.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250