Lawsuit Claims Pay Hikes for Cuomo and Hochul Are Unconstitutional
"No one should be above the law, and we should expect more from the legislators and state officers who take oaths to support our constitution," said Cameron Macdonald, executive director and lead attorney for the Government Justice Center.
December 11, 2019 at 04:00 PM
4 minute read
A group that successfully sued to strike down a pay raise for members of the New York Legislature is now challenging a salary hike given this year to Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul.
The lawsuit filed Wednesday claims that neither Cuomo nor Hochul can lawfully receive a pay raise in the middle of their term, and that the state has been illegally doling out that increase.
The challenge was brought in Albany County Supreme Court by the Government Justice Center, a nonprofit group that's been involved in several lawsuits related to actions by the state's government.
Cameron Macdonald, the group's executive director and lead attorney, said the salary hikes enacted for Cuomo and Hochul this year violate a section of the state's constitution. According to that provision, Section 7 of Article XIII, the salary received by a statewide official at the start of their elected term "shall not be increased or diminished during the term for which he or she shall have been elected or appointed."
Ignoring that provision would set a dangerous precedent and threaten the rule of law in New York, Macdonald said.
"No one should be above the law, and we should expect more from the legislators and state officers who take oaths to support our constitution," Macdonald said.
The lawsuit was brought against state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, whose office is accused of unlawfully honoring the pay increases for Cuomo and Hochul.
When Cuomo took office in January at the start of his third term, his salary was $179,000, and Hochul made $151,500.
The state Legislature, in March, approved a joint resolution to raise Cuomo's salary to $250,000 and Hochul's to $220,000 by the start of 2021. Those increases were scheduled to be phased in, starting with an initial pay hike this year.
Under the resolution, Cuomo's salary was increased to $200,000 this year and Hochul's increased to $190,000.
According to the Government Justice Center, those raises were unlawful because they were approved and enacted after the start of their most recent term. To be lawful, they would have had to take effect at the start of the next four-year term for both positions, starting in 2023, or have been approved last year.
But under the scheme for how those raises were decided, the Legislature wouldn't have been able to approve them before this year.
That's because they were born from a special report by a state-sanctioned committee, published about a year ago. That committee was created by lawmakers to decide whether the Legislature and statewide officials should receive a pay raise.
At the time, the committee determined it was allowed to enact a pay raise for members of the Legislature without any additional action, but that any pay increase for Cuomo or Hochul would have to be approved by the Legislature because of legal limitations.
The committee's report was later challenged in court by the Government Justice Center, which was successful in striking down the salary increases scheduled to take effect for the Legislature in 2020 and 2021. The lawsuit also invalidated other parts of the committee's report.
The New York Attorney General's Office had initially sought to appeal that decision, but later dropped that effort in a letter to an appellate court in Albany.
Representatives for Cuomo and DiNapoli were not immediately available for comment on the lawsuit filed Wednesday.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250