Cuomo Vetoes Bills Expanding Charitable Bail Organizations, Expediting Rap Sheet Disclosure
"Governor Cuomo's veto is an affront to the justice reforms that make our state a leader and to the dozens of legislators who supported the bill this past session," Rivera said.
December 13, 2019 at 05:52 PM
5 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo vetoed two bills Friday, widely supported by criminal defense attorneys in New York that would have expanded the operations of charitable bail organizations and given public defenders easier access to their clients' rap sheets.
In separate messages with each veto, Cuomo wrote that the bills are unnecessary given a sweeping set of changes approved this year to the state's criminal justice laws. Those laws will eliminate cash bail for most nonviolent and low-level charges, and take effect next month.
Those changes, set to take effect at the start of next year, will represent a major overhaul of the state's laws on cash bail, criminal discovery and the right to a speedy trial. Democrats in the Legislature had seen the pair of now-vetoed bills as a supplement to those changes.
The more controversial of the two bills would have allowed charitable bail organizations to post up to $10,000 in bail for a defendant, an increase from the $2,000 they're allowed to offer now. The bill was largely opposed by Republicans.
It also would have allowed charitable bail organizations to operate in more areas outside New York City. The current law only allows them to operate in one county outside New York City.
The bill would have also reduced the fee for charitable bail organizations to register with the state from $1,000 to $500.
The bill vetoed Friday would have allowed charitable bail organizations to post bail for defendants in cases where the charges against them would still be bail-eligible under the new laws.
Cuomo wrote in his veto message that lawmakers should wait to see how the upcoming changes to cash bail develop before sending him a bill expanding the operations of charitable bail organizations.
"Any amendments involving charitable bail organizations that might be needed should be considered after this year's bail reforms have had an opportunity to be fully implemented and the specific needs are identified," Cuomo wrote.
The measure was sponsored by state Sen. Gustavo Rivera, D-Bronx, who rebuked Cuomo's veto in a statement Friday afternoon. He said Cuomo's office had agreed to sign the bill when a final version was negotiated earlier this year.
"I am appalled that the governor did not deem this common sense measure appropriate to become law," Rivera said. "Especially since, during budget negotiations, there was an agreement between the Senate, Assembly and the governor to pass this bill and have it signed into law."
"Governor Cuomo's veto is an affront to the justice reforms that make our state a leader and to the dozens of legislators who supported the bill this past session," Rivera continued.
The second bill Cuomo rejected was approved by the state Legislature in June in a nearly unanimous vote.
That bill would have allowed public defenders and administrators of assigned counsel plans to more easily gain access to their clients' rap sheets, or criminal history reports. Those attorneys currently don't have direct access to those files, which are housed by the state.
Those attorneys, under the bill, would be added to the list of so-called "qualified agencies," meaning they would be allowed to enter into agreements with the state Division of Criminal Justice Services to access criminal history information.
Current law doesn't allow that kind of access for public defenders. Instead, they have to rely on prosecutors, police departments and judges to get their clients' rap sheets.
In a letter sent to Cuomo this week, a coalition of public defenders and statewide attorney trade groups had urged the bill's signature, calling it "long-overdue."
"This bill would support the state's goal of improving the quality of public defense for all New Yorkers who cannot afford an attorney by providing public defenders with an important tool to enhance justice and improve efficiency," the letter said.
Cuomo, in his veto message Friday, wrote that the new changes to the state's laws on criminal discovery will make the bill unnecessary. Under the new law, prosecutors will have to provide defense attorneys with a defendant's criminal history, he wrote.
"I enacted sweeping discovery reform that becomes effective January 1, 2020 which requires prosecutors to provide defense attorneys with a record of the judgment of convictions and any pending criminal actions of witnesses at the advent of a criminal case," Cuomo wrote.
"Therefore, this bill is superfluous and duplicative of existing and prospective statutory requirements," he continued.
Cuomo also wrote that the bill would place an "unfunded fiscal burden" on DCJS that he opposed. The state is currently facing a $6.1 billion budget gap.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
Trending Stories
- 1The Evolution of a Virtual Court System
- 2New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 3Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 42024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 5What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250