Former Suffolk County DA, Top Aide Found Guilty of Obstruction of Justice in Cover-Up Case
Eastern District of New York U.S. Attorney Richard Donoghue described Spota and McPartland's behavior as "an attack on the justice system itself."
December 17, 2019 at 11:32 AM
4 minute read
A Long Island federal jury Tuesday found former Suffolk County District Attorney Tom Spota and his former anti-corruption unit chief Christopher McPartland guilty of obstruction of justice, witness tampering and other offenses Tuesday.
Jurors deliberated for nearly a full day before returning the verdict.
Spota's defense attorney was Alan Vinegrad of Covington & Burling. McPartland's lawyer was Larry Krantz of Krantz & Berman.
Prosecutors spent about three weeks presenting evidence on Spota and McPartland's involvement with Suffolk County's disgraced former police chief Jimmy Burke, who spent three years in prison after assaulting a burglary suspect and attempting to cover it up.
Spota, 78, and McPartland, 54, were deeply involved in that cover-up and played a big role in an overall culture of paranoia and corruption among Suffolk County law enforcement officials, prosecutors argued.
Vinegrad and Krantz argued that the government's key witness, a former Suffolk County police official who had pleaded guilty to conspiracy to obstruct justice, was unreliable because of his history of alcoholism, infidelity and mental health issues.
There was little evidence in writing in the case, and defense lawyers argued that phone records showing the timing and frequency of the men's conversations with Burke and other officials should not serve as proof of a crime.
Eastern District of New York U.S. Attorney Richard Donoghue was scheduled to make a statement shortly after noon Tuesday, a press spokesman for the federal prosecutor's office said after the verdict was read.
Christopher Loeb, the man assaulted after his 2013 burglary arrest, attended the trial and described himself as ecstatic at the verdict, though he said he isn't the only victim.
"It's a weight off my shoulders, it's like this dark cloud has been lifted," Loeb told reporters for Newsday and other news outlets. "He deserves everything he got … he deserves much more."
Krantz said he and his colleagues will keep fighting for McPartland, who maintains his innocence.
"We are deeply disappointed by the verdict, which we believe was not supported by the credible evidence at trial," he said in a statement.
Vinegrad did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Donoghue described Spota and McPartland's behavior as "an attack on the justice system itself."
"As prosecutors, the defendants were obligated to support the law they enforce, but the criminal actions taken by these men made a mockery of that obligation," Donoghue said in a statement.
In a statement, Suffolk County Executive Steve Bellone said the verdict confirms that Spota and McPartland were "running a criminal enterprise out of the District Attorney's office."
"At the time I called for his resignation (in 2016), Tom Spota's power was at its peak and their criminal enterprise was in full swing," Bellone said. "This culture of corruption has had a real and profound impact. They ruined lives and destroyed careers."
The Suffolk County Attorney is reviewing how to recover salary and benefits from Spota and McPartland, Bellone said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
SEC Under Trump 2.0 Likely to Take More 'Measured' Enforcement Approach, Observers Say
Trending Stories
- 1Why Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
- 2The Whys and Hows of a Mediator’s Proposal
- 3Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250