Westchester Town Justice Censured After Invoking His Judicial Office in Confrontations
"A profane rant, a demeaning ethnic remark and gratuitous reminders to people that you are a judge, undermine respect for the bench," a judicial conduct official said.
December 23, 2019 at 01:09 PM
5 minute read
A town justice in Westchester County received a sanction Monday after a state disciplinary panel found he mentioned he was a judge during a confrontation with a smoke shop owner, and again while defending comments he made as an attorney perceived to be racist by a judge.
Michael Tawil, an attorney and justice of the Ossining Town Court, agreed to be censured by the state Commission on Judicial Conduct, which disclosed the sanction Monday.
It won't follow him for long; Tawil's current term ends this year, and he didn't run for reelection. He ran for Westchester County Court this year, but was unsuccessful.
The determination is actually related to a separate matter from the commission this year that resulted in the admonishment of Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Genine Edwards. She was the judge that perceived Tawil's comments to be racist.
The comment was part of a broader series of characterizations about one of the defendants in a personal injury case that Tawil, as an attorney, made during closing remarks. He represented another defendant in the trial and was trying to shift liability away from his client.
"On the other hand, you have Mr. Batista. He's on the phone talking to his female girlfriend or someone," Tawil said, followed by a series of other claims.
"For all we know, he could be frying up some platanos in the front seat. We don't know. But he's not paying attention to the road, what's going on around him, OK," Tawil then said.
Edwards called Tawil and his client's insurance adjuster into her chambers the next day before the jury was charged to discuss settling the case. She told him she thought his comment about "frying up some platanos" was racist.
"What's going to happen now is your client is going to pay $25,000 to settle this case right now or I am going to report you to the Appellate Division, Second Department," Edwards said, according to the commission. "That's your license, counselor."
Tawil disclosed to Edwards, during the conversation, that he was a part-time town justice and would never "intentionally make a racist comment." He later testified before the commission that he felt threatened and nervous during the interaction.
He didn't end up settling the case for the amount Edwards suggested, and his client was ultimately forced to pay more as a result of the jury's verdict.
Tawil later disclosed the conversation to the state Commission on Judicial Conduct as a way of reporting the ultimatum she made in her chambers. That led to a probe into Edwards, which ended with her admonishment.
It also backfired on Tawil. While disclosing their conversation, he had also told the commission about his remarks about Batista that prompted her reaction. Edwards hadn't reported Tawil for the comment. The panel discovered it because he reported her.
"Upon reviewing respondent's complaint against Judge Edwards, the commission authorized investigation of respondent's own conduct in the matter," the commission wrote in its determination Monday.
Tawil was also accused, by the commission, of invoking his position as a judge when he confronted the owner of a smoke shop in Ossining. The shop displayed paraphernalia used for smoking in its windows, like glass pipes and hookahs.
When Tawil saw the paraphernalia in the shop's window, he entered the store to confront its manager about the display.
"What is this bullshit?" Tawil said to an employee, according to the commission.
Tawil told the employee to "take this shit down" and said stores in Ossining shouldn't sell items that can be used for illegal drugs. The items sold at the shop were legal, but could be used to smoke either tobacco or illegal drugs.
When the employee insisted their products were legal to sell, Tawil pushed back, according to the commission.
"Bullshit, I have never seen anyone smoke tobacco from a crack pipe," Tawil said.
He also told employees at the store that he was a judge at some point during the interaction. A police officer eventually showed up and explained that the items Tawil was protesting were legal. The officer referred to him as a judge.
Commission Administrator Robert Tembeckjian said in a statement Monday that Tawil accepted responsibility for misbehaving in both instances and apologized for his behavior.
"On or off the bench, a judge's conduct must embody the integrity and dignity of the judiciary," Tembeckjian said. "A profane rant, a demeaning ethnic remark and gratuitous reminders to people that you are a judge, undermine respect for the bench."
Tawil could not immediately be reached for comment on the determination Monday. He was represented before the commission by Deborah Scalise from Scalise & Hamilton in Scarsdale. Scalise declined to comment Monday.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.