Pfizer Sued Over Zantac Ingredient Plaintiffs Call 'Unfit for Human Consumption'
The lawsuit, which estimates a proposed class in the "tens of thousands," alleged breaches of warranty, unjust enrichment, fraud, fraudulent concealment and violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.
January 02, 2020 at 05:46 PM
3 minute read
A proposed class action filed Thursday in Manhattan federal court accused Pfizer Inc. of misleading consumers about the health risks associated with the over-the-counter heartburn medicine Zantac.
The lawsuit targeted the New York-based drugmaker over its former production of the medicine, which includes NDMA, an organic chemical that has been linked to certain forms of cancer. According to the filing, Pfizer manufactured Zantac from 2000 to 2006, but never listed NDMA as an ingredient or disclosed the chemical's cancer-causing properties.
"While defendant represented that its Zantac formulation was safe for use, Zantac contains dangerously high levels of NDMA, rendering the product dangerous and unfit for human consumption," attorneys from Bursor & Fisher in New York wrote in 22-page complaint.
In a statement, Pfizer said that it had not sold Zantac in 13 years, and was planning to respond to the suit.
"We believe this proposed class action complaint is without merit and will respond to it in due course," the company said.
The suit was filed on behalf of plaintiff Dana Viola, a New Jersey resident who began purchasing Zantac in 2000. Viola said she stopped using Zantac in 2016, after several drugmakers and pharmacies began recalling branded and generic versions of Zantac.
A spate of recent lawsuits have accused Sanofi-Aventis, the current maker of branded Zantac in the U.S., and an array of generic drugmakers of similar violations. Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and others have all issued voluntary recalls after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration found NDMA in the drugs this past September.
Viola's suit cited figures by Valisure, an FDA-registered online pharmacy, which found that certain lots of Zantac contained between 2.5 million and 2.8 million nanograms per tablet. The FDA, the suit said, limits the permissible intake limit of NDMA at 96 nanograms per day.
"These medications are worthless, as they contain harmful levels of NDMA. As the medications expose users to NDMA well above the legal limit, the medications are not fit for human consumption," the lawsuit said. "Plaintiff is further entitled to statutory damages, damages for the injury sustained in consuming high levels of acutely-toxic NDMA, and for damages related to defendant's conduct."
The lawsuit, which estimates a proposed class in the "tens of thousands," alleged breaches of warranty, unjust enrichment, fraud, fraudulent concealment and violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. It seeks compensatory, statutory and punitive damages, as well as restitution and attorney fees.
Viola also asked that the court to approve a "subclass" of plaintiffs who bought Zantac in New Jersey. Viola is represented by Andrew Obergfell and Joseph Marchese of Bursor & Fisher in New York and Neal Deckant from the firm's Walnut Creek, California, office.
The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, has not yet been assigned to a judge.
Read More:
2nd Circuit Says Federal Courts Lack Jurisdiction to Hear Pfizer Case for $8M in Tax Dispute
Del. Court Orders Insurers to Provide Coverage in $486M Settlement of Pfizer NY Shareholder Dispute
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMajor Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readLawsuit Alleging $23 Million Contract Breach Against Biogen Moves Forward
Bristol-Myers Squibb Wins Dismissal of $6.4 Billion Lawsuit Alleging Intentional Delay of Cancer Drug
Trending Stories
- 1Houston Law Firm Files $250K Breach of Contract Suit Against 2 Former Lawyers
- 2The Week in Data Feb. 3: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 3Mass Tort Cases: Challenges for Plaintiff’s and Defense Counsel
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs: Davis Wright Tremaine, Wilmer and More
- 5Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250