Pfizer Sued Over Zantac Ingredient Plaintiffs Call 'Unfit for Human Consumption'
The lawsuit, which estimates a proposed class in the "tens of thousands," alleged breaches of warranty, unjust enrichment, fraud, fraudulent concealment and violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.
January 02, 2020 at 05:46 PM
3 minute read
A proposed class action filed Thursday in Manhattan federal court accused Pfizer Inc. of misleading consumers about the health risks associated with the over-the-counter heartburn medicine Zantac.
The lawsuit targeted the New York-based drugmaker over its former production of the medicine, which includes NDMA, an organic chemical that has been linked to certain forms of cancer. According to the filing, Pfizer manufactured Zantac from 2000 to 2006, but never listed NDMA as an ingredient or disclosed the chemical's cancer-causing properties.
"While defendant represented that its Zantac formulation was safe for use, Zantac contains dangerously high levels of NDMA, rendering the product dangerous and unfit for human consumption," attorneys from Bursor & Fisher in New York wrote in 22-page complaint.
In a statement, Pfizer said that it had not sold Zantac in 13 years, and was planning to respond to the suit.
"We believe this proposed class action complaint is without merit and will respond to it in due course," the company said.
The suit was filed on behalf of plaintiff Dana Viola, a New Jersey resident who began purchasing Zantac in 2000. Viola said she stopped using Zantac in 2016, after several drugmakers and pharmacies began recalling branded and generic versions of Zantac.
A spate of recent lawsuits have accused Sanofi-Aventis, the current maker of branded Zantac in the U.S., and an array of generic drugmakers of similar violations. Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and others have all issued voluntary recalls after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration found NDMA in the drugs this past September.
Viola's suit cited figures by Valisure, an FDA-registered online pharmacy, which found that certain lots of Zantac contained between 2.5 million and 2.8 million nanograms per tablet. The FDA, the suit said, limits the permissible intake limit of NDMA at 96 nanograms per day.
"These medications are worthless, as they contain harmful levels of NDMA. As the medications expose users to NDMA well above the legal limit, the medications are not fit for human consumption," the lawsuit said. "Plaintiff is further entitled to statutory damages, damages for the injury sustained in consuming high levels of acutely-toxic NDMA, and for damages related to defendant's conduct."
The lawsuit, which estimates a proposed class in the "tens of thousands," alleged breaches of warranty, unjust enrichment, fraud, fraudulent concealment and violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. It seeks compensatory, statutory and punitive damages, as well as restitution and attorney fees.
Viola also asked that the court to approve a "subclass" of plaintiffs who bought Zantac in New Jersey. Viola is represented by Andrew Obergfell and Joseph Marchese of Bursor & Fisher in New York and Neal Deckant from the firm's Walnut Creek, California, office.
The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, has not yet been assigned to a judge.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMajor Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readLawsuit Alleging $23 Million Contract Breach Against Biogen Moves Forward
Bristol-Myers Squibb Wins Dismissal of $6.4 Billion Lawsuit Alleging Intentional Delay of Cancer Drug
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250