Donziger Says Seward & Kissel May Have Chevron-Related Conflicts
The suspended lawyer, who is being prosecuted by a team of Seward & Kissel lawyers, has said business connections between the firm, its clients and Chevron call their impartiality into question.
January 03, 2020 at 03:15 PM
4 minute read
This story has been updated with Seward & Kissel's response Friday.
Steven Donziger, the suspended lawyer who is facing criminal contempt charges stemming from his long fight with Chevron over environmental contamination in Ecuador, has asked a federal judge to force court-appointed prosecutors at Seward & Kissel to disclose any ties their firm has to the oil giant.
Seward & Kissel lawyers Rita Glavin, Brian Maloney and Sareen Armani were appointed last August to prosecute Donziger for criminal contempt for allegedly flouting a discovery order in a lawsuit brought by Chevron. The U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York declined to take up the criminal contempt case, leading to the unusual appointment of private prosecutors for a public prosecution.
In a Tuesday letter to U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska of the Southern District of New York, Donziger's lawyer, Andrew Frisch, said his research led him to believe that an unnamed Seward & Kissel partner served on Chevron's board and that the firm served clients who do business with Chevron or related entities. He said Glavin "has declined to answer my questions about Seward's ties to Chevron."
It wasn't clear Friday which people or entities Frisch was referring to. But one area of overlap between Chevron and Seward & Kissel is the shipping industry. Few law firms have maritime law practices that are as robust as Seward & Kissel's, and Chevron's oil and liquified natural gas are transported globally on ships.
Another possible overlap is Oaktree Capital Management. Frisch's letter referred to a Chevron board member who is the vice-chairman of an investment fund that has funded at least two of Seward & Kissel's clients. Chevron director John Frank is Oaktree's vice chairman, and Oaktree is listed as an investor on at least two deals listed on Seward & Kissel's website.
In a response filed later Friday, Glavin said it was simply not true that any Seward partner had been on Chevron's board. As to the allegation that its clients had done business with Chevron, she wrote, "even if true, this creates no conflict or conflicting loyalty for the prosecution team in this criminal case."
"Prior to taking on this representation, Seward performed appropriate conflict checks (as it does before taking on any representation)," she wrote. She said the case law cited by Donziger didn't apply.
Frisch's letter Tuesday also called for Glavin and her colleagues to disclose any communications they have had with the chambers of U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan of the Southern District of New York, who appointed them to prosecute Donziger. Frisch said it was "it is important to clarify whether and the extent to which" the judge has played a role in the prosecution.
In response to Donziger's question about contacts with Judge Kaplan, Glavin wrote, "the prosecution does not work for Judge Kaplan and makes its own decisions in this case."
Glavin and Frisch declined to comment.
The letters come as Donziger facing legal threats on three fronts. The suspended attorney, who has been subject to home confinement for several months, won a $9 billion judgment against Chevron in Ecuador's courts in 2011, but Chevron successfully argued in U.S. courts that the judgment was obtained through bribery. The oil giant, in turn, won an $800,000 judgment against Donziger and has tried to enforce it and to have him disbarred.
While the criminal contempt case advances, Donziger has sought to partly pause the civil case brought by Chevron, which is seeking to enforce its judgment. He appealed a Dec. 9 decision by Kaplan rejecting his motion in that case. He has also asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to reverse a decision by Preska to keep him subject to home confinement.
In the meantime, potential disbarment proceedings have been ongoing in New York state courts. Referee John Horan heard several days of testimony in October and posttrial briefs were filed in December.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readLukoil Pan Americas Sues Investment Firm Over Alleged $18 Million Breach
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.