Jury Selection Will Be Difficult, Extra Accusers' Testimony Key in Weinstein Rape Trial, Observers Say
Weinstein's lawyers, the Chicago attorneys Damon Cheronis and Donna Rotunno and the New York firm Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, have said they hope jurors can separate media coverage of Weinstein from Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.'s charges against him, which involve a few specific incidents.
January 03, 2020 at 06:27 PM
4 minute read
The chances that Hollywood movie producer Harvey Weinstein's defense team can find a full complement of jurors unfamiliar with the allegations against him are vanishingly small, several New York lawyers agreed in the days before jury selection begins in Weinstein's Manhattan criminal trial.
Judge James Burke of the New York City Criminal Court is set to hear pretrial motions Monday, and jury selection is expected to begin Tuesday and take about two weeks. The trial is likely to last into March.
All potential jurors will be asked to describe what they've heard about Weinstein, whose interactions with women over decades in the movie business were the subject of major investigations by the New Yorker and the New York Times in 2017.
They're also likely to be asked about their personal experiences with sexual assault—Weinstein is charged with rape, predatory sexual assault and criminal sexual act—and sexual harassment. Weinstein, 67, has pleaded not guilty to all the charges.
Dozens of women, including a number of celebrities, have accused Weinstein of misconduct across several decades, and the flood of accusations against him has been credited with accelerating the #MeToo movement and changing the conversation about appropriate treatment of women in the workplace.
Weinstein's lawyers, the Chicago attorneys Damon Cheronis and Donna Rotunno and the New York firm Aidala Bertuna & Kamins, have said they hope jurors can separate media coverage of Weinstein from Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.'s charges against him, which involve a few specific incidents.
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department denied Weinstein's motion to change venue for the trial in the fall. Prosecutors had argued that jurors across the state all had plenty of access to news about Weinstein, so moving the case out of Manhattan would make little difference.
Mark Bederow, who worked as a Manhattan assistant district attorney before moving into private criminal defense, said jury selection could make or break the case for Weinstein's team.
"If they can get a group of jurors who are willing to put aside whatever they've heard prior to it, put aside whatever feelings they have about how gross Weinstein is or distasteful and recognize that it comes down to whether the prosecution proves (its case) beyond a reasonable doubt … if that's the jury he gets, I think he's in the game, but it's going to be tough," Bederow said.
The Weinstein team is expected to attempt to prove that the women continued to interact with Weinstein after the alleged offenses, in the hopes that subsequent positive interactions will make it hard for jurors to believe the women's accounts.
But three more Weinstein accusers are expected to take the witness stand to testify about his "prior bad acts," even though he's not charged with criminal offenses against them.
That testimony could be "substantially problematic" for Weinstein, Bederow said.
"You saw that in the (Bill) Cosby case— that's the obvious comparison, I think, where that seemed to have a serious impact on the result of that case," Bederow said.
Bill Cosby's first trial on sexual assault charges, in 2017, ended with a hung jury. But a Pennsylvania judge allowed five additional accusers to testify as prior bad acts witnesses at his retrial, and he was convicted of three counts of sexual assault in 2018.
Employment lawyer Doug Wigdor, who represents one of the three witnesses expected to testify against Weinstein, said his client wanted to help with the prosecution against Weinstein however she could.
"She's not in this at all for the money, because there is no money," Wigdor said. "She's in it solely for the purpose of holding him accountable for his actions."
Joan Illuzzi-Orbon, a veteran prosecutor known for prosecuting the missing-child homicide case of Etan Patz, is leading the case for the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, which declined to comment Friday.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
White & Case Settles Wrongful Conviction Lawsuit With City Agreeing to Pay $9.45 Million
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome', DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250