The Future of Mediation in Trusts and Estates
In this Trusts and Estates law column, C. Raymond Radigan and Lisa Fenech discuss a new mediation initiative that is helping to resolve the logjam within the courts. Practitioners should be aware of this plan, and the ways it may help their clients resolve family disputes in a more efficient manner.
January 03, 2020 at 12:00 PM
6 minute read
Throughout years past, it was common in Surrogate's Court for petitions to be filed in various proceedings and for decisions and orders to be rendered fairly quickly. Typically, the parties would not appear in front of the court again, except in connection with New York estate tax motions. The few matters that were contested by the parties would very often be resolved by settlement or a court determination after a motion, trial or a hearing. However, the growing population of New York combined with the down-sizing of the court's staff has caused this process to become a slower version of itself. As highlighted in the article published in the New York Law Journal, titled "Mediation as an Alternative to Estate Litigation" by C. Raymond Radigan and Moira Jabir, mediation and arbitration can offer many benefits to trusts and estates matters. As such, an initiative has begun in Surrogate's Court, among many other courts, to offer the benefits of mediation to all Surrogate's Court cases, which is encouraged by Chief Judge Janet DiFiore.
Historically, there were very few matters that remained in Surrogate's Court for long. For instance, Nassau County probated about 3,800 wills a year and handled less than 1,000 administration proceedings in the 1980s and 1990s. Jurisdiction would be promptly obtained over all necessary parties and matters completed quickly. There was even a joke throughout the courthouse to this effect—your relative could pass away on a Friday, the petition be filed on Monday, the will would be admitted to probate, letters would issue and distributions would be made on Tuesday, and the children could go buy a new vehicle and go to the funeral in style on Wednesday. Although a bit exaggerated, the reality of the courts at that time was if everyone cooperated, which they usually did, there would be no delays and matters could be finalized expeditiously. Only relatively few matters were delayed, either because infants were involved or there was a disagreement among family members resulting in litigation.
However, the growing population of people in New York, along with a down-sizing of the court staff, has caused the process of probating a will, or any matter in Surrogate's Court, to become significantly longer than the "weekend probate" as joked about above. To help combat this, the Office of Court Administration instituted standards and goals across all courts, which require the courts to account for the status of all matters that have been filed, and to attempt to complete them within a certain time frame. The Surrogate, the Law Department and staff have done their best to move matters along as required under standards and goals; however, this requires additional work for the court staff. Since the court's staff has diminished considerably in the last 10 to 20 years, they could not keep the matters flowing, so another ultimate means of resolution had to be implemented. One of the ultimate means is mediation.
As part of the Chief Judge's Excellence Initiative, on May 14, 2019, Chief Judge DiFiore and Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks issued a press release announcing a system wide mediation initiative. This initiative will refer all civil cases, except appropriate exceptions, to mediation or some other form of alternative dispute resolution as the first step in the case proceeding in court. The Administrative Judges "will formulate plans tailored to local conditions and circumstances," enabling each court to implement and interpret the initiative according to their needs. See New York State Unified Court System Press Release, Court System to Implement Presumptive, Early Alternative Dispute Resolution for Civil Cases, at p. 2, May 14, 2019. The initiative took effect in September 2019, and is constantly evolving.
Across New York, counties have begun to implement mediation in the courtroom, expanding the historical meaning of "mediation" to a more inclusive definition. This new view of mediation is helping litigants, and the courts, to resolve matters quickly, and with great results. Chief Administrative Judge Marks stated that mediation "has a proven record of success, with high settlement rates and strong user satisfaction among litigants and lawyers." Id. at p. 3.
Many of the Surrogates are utilizing retired Surrogates and judges familiar with trusts and estates matters as mediators. There is also training available for attorneys to become mediators. Some counties provide that the mediator will serve pro bono to determine the issues, spending about an hour and a half with the attorneys and parties in an attempt to see if the matter can be resolved through mediation. If not, the parties have the option to continue with mediation, with an agreed upon compensation for the mediator to be shared by the parties. If the mediation fails and the matter has to be tried, the mediator may be authorized to explore whether the parties may agree for the mediator to supervise disclosure to ensure that the parties are ready for trial, either by the court, or perhaps the mediator as referee. Similar procedures are being explored in the various Surrogate's Court in order for the Surrogates to be able to comply with the standards and goals of the initiative. As the program progresses, it will be fine-tuned as necessary.
The success thus far, and the ability of the courts to create their own methods for mediation, has opened the door to discussions of implementing mediation in different parts of the process. There have even been offerings of mediation before a Will is drafted, as part of the estate planning process. For example, if Son knew Mother was leaving the family business to Son, but Son has no interest in the family business, and wants the family home left to Daughter, mediation before Mother passes could help resolve this. Mediation as part of the estate planning process can help prevent litigation down the line, keeping the matter out of the courts, and proving further how mediation can benefit all.
This new mediation initiative is helping to resolve the logjam within the courts. Practitioners should be aware of this plan, and the ways it may help their clients resolve family disputes in a more efficient manner. Mediation provides an avenue for clients to be heard, matters to be resolved quickly, and court and estate resources to be preserved.
C. Raymond Radigan is a former Surrogate of Nassau County and of counsel to Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. He also chaired the Advisory Committee to the Legislature on Estates, Powers and Trusts Law and the Surrogate's Court Procedure Act. Lisa Fenech is an associate at the firm.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250