Changes to New Laws on Cash Bail Possible, Cuomo Says, as Legislature Begins New Session
A top Democrat in the state Senate said Monday that lawmakers should take a wait-and-see approach before they consider any amendments to the new laws.
January 06, 2020 at 05:39 PM
5 minute read
Democrats shouldn't dismiss the idea that New York's new laws limiting the use of cash bail may need changes as the state Legislature returns to Albany this week, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday.
A top Democrat in the state Senate, meanwhile, said Monday that lawmakers should take a wait-and-see approach before they consider any amendments to the new laws.
The conflict comes just days after the new laws on cash bail took effect. They were implemented at the start of the year, but have been the subject of criticism from Republicans since they were approved last March.
Cuomo, speaking at an event in Manhattan, said he supported the intent of the new laws, but that tweaks may be needed.
"There's no doubt this is still a work in progress and there are other changes that have to be made," Cuomo said. "Again, it's literally three or four days, the Legislature comes back next year, and we're going to work on it because there are consequences that we have to adjust for."
Democrats who lead both chambers of the state Legislature have said in recent months that a majority of lawmakers don't support amending the newly enacted laws. There have been one-off proposals, but each has failed to become law.
The new laws largely eliminated the option of cash bail for most low-level and nonviolent charges, meaning that individuals accused of those crimes are now allowed to remain out of jail ahead of trial.
In the months leading up to the implementation of the new reforms, the law enforcement community voiced concerns over a series of charges that would no longer be bail-eligible, like third-degree assault as a hate crime and the criminal sale of a controlled substance.
Those concerns were echoed by Republicans, who have called for the reforms to either be delayed or amended so that judges can consider additional factors when deciding whether someone should be released or held before trial.
That's typically referred to as a defendant's so-called "dangerousness," or perceived threat to public safety. It's never been used in New York to determine pretrial incarceration, but prosecutors have called for that to change with the new limits on cash bail.
They've argued that, if judges can no longer assign bail for certain charges, they should be allowed to look at a defendant's background or criminal history to decide if they could pose a threat to public safety upon release.
Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, D-Scarsdale, introduced legislation Monday to do just that.
Paulin said in a statement Monday that a recent spate of anti-Semitic incidents in New York should prompt lawmakers to give judges more discretion to decide if someone should be allowed to remain free after they've been charged with such a crime.
"Bail reform needed to happen in the interest of justice and equal treatment of accused individuals, but we must balance those objectives against the safety and security of our residents," Paulin said. "During this time of widespread and increased attacks against the Jewish community, we must do all we can to make all New Yorkers feel safe and protected."
Paulin cited a specific incident in Brooklyn, in late December, when a woman was released without bail after she allegedly attacked three Jewish women while shouting anti-Semitic slurs.
That woman, Tiffany Harris, was accused of a similar assault the next day and again released without bail. After a third arrest, Harris was admitted for a psychiatric evaluation. Paulin said judges should have more discretion to detain someone in future cases.
A similar measure was previously announced by Sen. James Tedisco, R-Schenectady, and Assemblyman Angelo Santabarbara, D-Schenectady.
Other Democrats have said the new laws on cash bail should be given a chance to work before lawmakers consider imposing any major changes to the statute.
Sen. Michael Gianaris, a Democrat from Queens and the deputy majority leader of the Senate, said Monday that he wants to collect more data on the impact of the new laws before he considers supporting an amendment.
"This law has been in place for six days," Gianaris said. "So, for someone to decide in six days that this is already not working is not rendering an opinion based on information and data, which is how we try to make our decisions."
But the door isn't closed on possible changes, Gianaris said. While he supports the laws as enacted, he said Democrats will continue to evaluate if there's any room for amendments to the statute after they return to Albany this week for the legislative session.
"The job of the Legislature is to improve the laws. We believe we've done that with these reforms," Gianaris said. "There's some conversation about continued changes that may be necessary. We'll certainly look at things as they come up and discussions will continue."
READ MORE:
No Plans to Delay, Change NY's New Criminal Justice Laws, Senate Leader Says
Assembly Speaker Says There's No Appetite to Delay NY Criminal Justice Laws Amid Cost Concerns
Mayors in NY Join Call for More State Funding to Implement Criminal Justice Reforms
More Funding Needed for Pretrial Services Ahead of NY Bail Reform, Supporters Say
New Funding for Pretrial Services Agencies Left Out of NY Bail Reform Law
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250