Section 1983 is designed to compensate and deter constitutional violations by state and local officials. The damages phase of a §1983 action may present a variety of challenging issues. The Tenth Circuit’s recent decision in Burke v. Regalado, 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019) provides valuable analyses of several of these issues. The decision spans a whopping 104 pages in the Federal Reporter, and, in addition to damages, tackles numerous procedural, evidentiary, and liability issues.

This column focuses on three major damages issues from the Burke case: (1) the propriety of plaintiff’s counsel’s “send a message” closing argument; (2) awards of punitive damages against supervisory officials who were not directly involved in violations of the plaintiff’s constitutional rights; and (3) the “setoff” issue of whether a court should reduce the jury’s award of compensatory damages against nonsettling defendants by the amount of a settlement with one of the defendants.

Background

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]