New LA Charges Don't Change NY Trial Plans or Bail Terms for Harvey Weinstein
Prosecutors told the judge that one of the two alleged victims in Los Angeles is expected to provide testimony in the New York trial to provide evidence of Weinstein's prior bad acts.
January 07, 2020 at 10:48 AM
4 minute read
Manhattan Criminal Court Judge James Burke on Tuesday refused to revoke Harvey Weinstein's bail or delay the trial in the wake of news of his charges on similar sex crime offenses in Los Angeles.
Burke's decision was made despite requests from lawyers on both sides of the ex-Hollywood film producer's criminal trial Tuesday morning. Prosecutors sought to revoke bail, while defense counsel said it would be impossible to find an impartial jury given coverage of the new charges.
The Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office announced the charges just a few hours after Weinstein's Manhattan trial on charges of rape and predatory sexual assault began Monday morning.
Just before jury selection was set to begin Tuesday, defense attorney Arthur Aidala of Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins told Burke that it would be impossible to find an impartial jury given the new charges, which include rape and related offenses in connection with two alleged 2013 incidents.
Aidala said he saw news about the new charges in a taxi ride and overheard an adjacent table discussing it at dinner Monday night.
Burke dismissed Aidala's request for a "cooling-off period," noting that juries are typically instructed that criminal charges do not mean a person is guilty.
He also rejected prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon's request to revoke Weinstein's bail. She argued that Weinstein could flee using his extensive financial resources, while defense attorney Donna Rotunno told Burke that because of health reasons Weinstein should not be jailed.
A new detail about the connection between the Los Angeles and New York accusations arose in court when Illuzzi-Orbon told Burke that one of the two alleged victims in Los Angeles is expected to testify in the New York trial.
She is one of three "prior bad acts" witnesses, who will be allowed to speak about behavior that did not lead to any criminal charge for Weinstein in New York.
The other alleged victim in the Los Angeles case has had no interaction with the Manhattan DA's office, Illuzzi-Orbon said.
Before the discussion of the Los Angeles charges, Burke marched into court to berate Weinstein for his use of electronic devices in court, which isn't allowed.
"Your client is using cellphones, despite repeated cautions, and texting a moment ago," Burke said while still fastening his judicial robe.
Burke said Weinstein's cellphone use has been an issue at each court appearance.
"My understanding from court staff is that he did turn over two cellphones to somebody [today] and then he had two more!" Burke said.
He urged Weinstein's lawyers to take their client's phones and keep them in a briefcase before turning to Weinstein himself.
"Mr. Weinstein, I could not implore you more to not answer the following question," he said. "OK, don't say anything. Is this really the way you want to end up in jail for the rest of your life? Is it?"
Jury selection is set to take at least two weeks. Burke said Tuesday that he hopes opening statements will begin after Martin Luther King Jr. Day.
READ MORE:
Harvey Weinstein Charged in Los Angeles as New York Trial Begins
Will Lawyer David Boies Be a Witness in Harvey Weinstein's Sex Crimes Trial?
Judge Blocks Harvey Weinstein's Bid to Dismiss New Indictment Ahead of January Trial
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWalt Disney, IBM Denied High Court Review of Old NY Franchise Tax Law
3 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Just Ahead of Oral Argument, Fubo Settles Antitrust Case with Disney, Fox, Warner Bros.
Trending Stories
- 1'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
- 2States Reach New $7.4B Opioid Deal With Purdue After SCOTUS Ruling
- 3$975,000 Settlement Reached After Fall on Sidewalk
- 4'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
- 5Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250