Spending Measure: Tax Changes for Individuals
In his Tax Tips column, Sidney Kess discusses a new law that makes an estimated $426 billion in tax cuts for both individuals and businesses. These changes require individuals to reexamine their tax returns for 2018, consider which new rules apply for 2019, and plan ahead for 2020 and beyond.
January 07, 2020 at 12:00 PM
6 minute read
To fund the government through the end of its 2020 fiscal year and provide funding for various projects and purposes, Congress passed a massive spending measure just before adjourning for the Christmas holiday and it was signed into law on Dec. 20, 2019. Titled the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (H.R. 1865), this new law makes an estimated $426 billion in tax cuts for both individuals and businesses. These changes require individuals to reexamine their tax returns for 2018, consider which new rules apply for 2019, and plan ahead for 2020 and beyond. Changes impacting businesses will be discussed in an upcoming column.
|Extended Provisions
A number of tax rules for individuals expired at the end of 2017. They have been extended retroactively to 2018; they apply as well for 2019 and 2020.
Exclusion for canceled home mortgage debt. Usually, the cancellation of debt results in taxable income. However, under this extended break, income from the cancellation of a mortgage up to $2 million on a principal residence is tax free.
Tuition and fees deduction. Individuals with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) up to $80,000 ($160,000 on a joint return) can take a deduction from gross income up to $2,000 for tuition and fees paid for higher education. This deduction does not require itemizing. However, depending on MAGI, individuals may save more taxes by claiming the American opportunity credit or lifetime learning credit; these credits were not changed by the spending measure.
Itemized medical expenses. The adjusted gross income (AGI) threshold for deducting unreimbursed medical expenses if itemizing, which was 7.5% of AGI in 2018, was set to 10% of AGI in 2019. The spending measure retains the lower AGI threshold for 2019 and 2020.
Mortgage insurance premiums. Those with AGI below a set amount can treat mortgage insurance premiums as home mortgage interest. This deduction can only be claimed by those who itemize.
Home energy improvements. Usually, capital improvements to a principal residence cannot be immediately written off. Instead, they are added to the basis of the home, which minimizes gain when the home is sold. However, certain energy improvements, such as insulation and storm windows, may qualify for a tax credit up to $500.
|Retirement Savings
The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act was included in the spending measure. This legislation—the first major change for retirement plans and IRAs since the Pension Protection Act of 2006—makes dramatic changes. The effective dates of the different provisions vary considerably. Here are some of the big changes for individuals:
End to IRA age cap. For 2019, no contribution to a traditional IRA can be made by someone who attains age 70½ by the end of the year. Starting in 2020, there is no age limit, so that anyone who has income from a job or self-employment can make contributions. There is no age limit for Roth IRA contributions; this has not changed.
Increase in age for RMDs. For 2019, required minimum distributions (RMDs) must begin by the end of the year in which an individual attains age 70½ (although the first RMD can be postponed until April 1 of the following year). Under the new law, for anyone who attains age 70½ after 2019, RMDs do not have to commence before age 72. This gives some individuals one or two more years of tax deferral (depending on when their birthday falls).
End to "stretch" for beneficiaries. Currently, individuals who inherit a required retirement account or IRA can spread their RMDs over their life expectancy (Table I, Single Life Expectancy, in IRS Publication 590-B). Under the new law, beneficiaries who inherit an account from a decedent dying after 2019, must drain the account no later than 10 years after the decedent's death. However, this new rule does not apply to:
- A surviving spouse. The spouse can roll over an inherited account and treat it as his/her own.
- Minor child. However, this exception ceases to apply when the child reaches the age of majority. Then the remainder of the distribution must be completed within 10 years of the age of majority.
- Disabled individual. This is a person unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity due to a medically determinable physical or mental impairment or a chronically ill individual unable to perform at least two activities of daily living as of the date of the death of the plan participant or IRA owner.
- Any individual who is not more than 10 years younger than the deceased participant or IRA owner.
Expanded definition of "compensation." Home health care workers do not have to include in gross income the "difficulty of care" payments they receive. However, they can treat these payments as compensation for purposes of making contributions to a 401(k) plan or IRA. This change applies to contributions on or after Dec. 20, 2019.
Penalty free withdrawals from qualified retirement plans. The 10% early distribution penalty that usually applies for distributions prior to age 59½ does not apply to distributions used to pay expenses for childbirth or adoption up to $5,000. This penalty exemption applies starting in 2020.
Penalty free withdrawals from 529 plans. Distributions from 529 plans used to pay qualified education costs are not taxed. Starting in 2020, distributions up $10,000 to pay student loan debt are treated as qualified costs; they are tax free.
|Other Changes
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act had revised the kiddie tax to subject unearned income of children to tax based on rates for trusts and estates. The spending measure repeals this provision (Code §1(j)(4)) so that a child's investment income over a set amount is taxed at the parents' highest marginal rate. This change is generally effective starting in 2020, but can be elected for 2018 or 2019.
While most of the changes in the spending measure reduce taxes, there are some revenue raisers (in addition to the end of the "stretch"). These include an increase in the failure to file penalty from $330 to $435. This change applies to tax returns required to be filed after Dec. 31, 2019 (i.e., 2019 income tax returns filed in the 2020 tax season).
|Conclusion
Anyone eligible for a tax break with respect to a 2018 return should determine whether it makes sense to file an amended return. Generally, an individual has three years from the date that the return was filed (or the due date if later) to submit a refund claim on an amended return.
Expect to see considerable IRS guidance on these law changes in the coming months.
Sidney Kess, CPA-attorney, is of counsel at Kostelanetz & Fink and senior consultant to Citrin Cooperman & Company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTreasury Issues New Regulations on Allocation of Partnership Liabilities
6 minute readBinding a Successor Town Board; Default on Stipulation of Settlement: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Trending Stories
- 1Increased Costs Proved a Drag on Profits for PA's AmLaw 200 in 2024
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-81
- 3Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 4'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 5FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250