Spending Measure: Tax Changes for Individuals
In his Tax Tips column, Sidney Kess discusses a new law that makes an estimated $426 billion in tax cuts for both individuals and businesses. These changes require individuals to reexamine their tax returns for 2018, consider which new rules apply for 2019, and plan ahead for 2020 and beyond.
January 07, 2020 at 12:00 PM
6 minute read
To fund the government through the end of its 2020 fiscal year and provide funding for various projects and purposes, Congress passed a massive spending measure just before adjourning for the Christmas holiday and it was signed into law on Dec. 20, 2019. Titled the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (H.R. 1865), this new law makes an estimated $426 billion in tax cuts for both individuals and businesses. These changes require individuals to reexamine their tax returns for 2018, consider which new rules apply for 2019, and plan ahead for 2020 and beyond. Changes impacting businesses will be discussed in an upcoming column.
Extended Provisions
A number of tax rules for individuals expired at the end of 2017. They have been extended retroactively to 2018; they apply as well for 2019 and 2020.
Exclusion for canceled home mortgage debt. Usually, the cancellation of debt results in taxable income. However, under this extended break, income from the cancellation of a mortgage up to $2 million on a principal residence is tax free.
Tuition and fees deduction. Individuals with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) up to $80,000 ($160,000 on a joint return) can take a deduction from gross income up to $2,000 for tuition and fees paid for higher education. This deduction does not require itemizing. However, depending on MAGI, individuals may save more taxes by claiming the American opportunity credit or lifetime learning credit; these credits were not changed by the spending measure.
Itemized medical expenses. The adjusted gross income (AGI) threshold for deducting unreimbursed medical expenses if itemizing, which was 7.5% of AGI in 2018, was set to 10% of AGI in 2019. The spending measure retains the lower AGI threshold for 2019 and 2020.
Mortgage insurance premiums. Those with AGI below a set amount can treat mortgage insurance premiums as home mortgage interest. This deduction can only be claimed by those who itemize.
Home energy improvements. Usually, capital improvements to a principal residence cannot be immediately written off. Instead, they are added to the basis of the home, which minimizes gain when the home is sold. However, certain energy improvements, such as insulation and storm windows, may qualify for a tax credit up to $500.
Retirement Savings
The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act was included in the spending measure. This legislation—the first major change for retirement plans and IRAs since the Pension Protection Act of 2006—makes dramatic changes. The effective dates of the different provisions vary considerably. Here are some of the big changes for individuals:
End to IRA age cap. For 2019, no contribution to a traditional IRA can be made by someone who attains age 70½ by the end of the year. Starting in 2020, there is no age limit, so that anyone who has income from a job or self-employment can make contributions. There is no age limit for Roth IRA contributions; this has not changed.
Increase in age for RMDs. For 2019, required minimum distributions (RMDs) must begin by the end of the year in which an individual attains age 70½ (although the first RMD can be postponed until April 1 of the following year). Under the new law, for anyone who attains age 70½ after 2019, RMDs do not have to commence before age 72. This gives some individuals one or two more years of tax deferral (depending on when their birthday falls).
End to "stretch" for beneficiaries. Currently, individuals who inherit a required retirement account or IRA can spread their RMDs over their life expectancy (Table I, Single Life Expectancy, in IRS Publication 590-B). Under the new law, beneficiaries who inherit an account from a decedent dying after 2019, must drain the account no later than 10 years after the decedent's death. However, this new rule does not apply to:
- A surviving spouse. The spouse can roll over an inherited account and treat it as his/her own.
- Minor child. However, this exception ceases to apply when the child reaches the age of majority. Then the remainder of the distribution must be completed within 10 years of the age of majority.
- Disabled individual. This is a person unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity due to a medically determinable physical or mental impairment or a chronically ill individual unable to perform at least two activities of daily living as of the date of the death of the plan participant or IRA owner.
- Any individual who is not more than 10 years younger than the deceased participant or IRA owner.
Expanded definition of "compensation." Home health care workers do not have to include in gross income the "difficulty of care" payments they receive. However, they can treat these payments as compensation for purposes of making contributions to a 401(k) plan or IRA. This change applies to contributions on or after Dec. 20, 2019.
Penalty free withdrawals from qualified retirement plans. The 10% early distribution penalty that usually applies for distributions prior to age 59½ does not apply to distributions used to pay expenses for childbirth or adoption up to $5,000. This penalty exemption applies starting in 2020.
Penalty free withdrawals from 529 plans. Distributions from 529 plans used to pay qualified education costs are not taxed. Starting in 2020, distributions up $10,000 to pay student loan debt are treated as qualified costs; they are tax free.
Other Changes
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act had revised the kiddie tax to subject unearned income of children to tax based on rates for trusts and estates. The spending measure repeals this provision (Code §1(j)(4)) so that a child's investment income over a set amount is taxed at the parents' highest marginal rate. This change is generally effective starting in 2020, but can be elected for 2018 or 2019.
While most of the changes in the spending measure reduce taxes, there are some revenue raisers (in addition to the end of the "stretch"). These include an increase in the failure to file penalty from $330 to $435. This change applies to tax returns required to be filed after Dec. 31, 2019 (i.e., 2019 income tax returns filed in the 2020 tax season).
Conclusion
Anyone eligible for a tax break with respect to a 2018 return should determine whether it makes sense to file an amended return. Generally, an individual has three years from the date that the return was filed (or the due date if later) to submit a refund claim on an amended return.
Expect to see considerable IRS guidance on these law changes in the coming months.
Sidney Kess, CPA-attorney, is of counsel at Kostelanetz & Fink and senior consultant to Citrin Cooperman & Company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
7 minute readA Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
13 minute readShifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250