Cuomo Details Proposal for New Domestic Terrorism Criminal Charge to NY Penal Law
Cuomo will now have the chance to pitch the idea to state lawmakers, who have said they're open to discussing the idea as part of this year's legislative session.
January 08, 2020 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo unveiled details Wednesday on his plan to create a new criminal charge of domestic terrorism, which is intended to be used by prosecutors when someone attempts to kill several people based on their race, religion or other identifiable factors.
"Let's acknowledge displays of hate-filled mass violence for what they are," Cuomo said. "They are domestic terrorism. That's what they are."
Cuomo first proposed the idea last year after the perpetrator of a mass shooting in El Paso, Texas, told police he was targeting Mexicans in the attack.
That was in August, when the state Legislature wasn't in session.
Cuomo will now have the chance to pitch the idea to state lawmakers, who have said they're open to discussing the idea as part of this year's legislative session.
The idea was fueled in recent weeks by an attack in Rockland County, where a man broke into a rabbi's home in Monsey and stabbed five people. One of those victims is still in a coma, and the family has said he's not expected to wake up.
Cuomo formally presented the proposal Wednesday at his State of the State address in Albany, which he began by decrying political divisions.
"Every day our people are besieged by crises, upheaval and unrest," Cuomo said. "These are the ugly signs of our times. The forecast suggests it will get worse before it gets better. The year ahead will not calm the waters but rather increase the turbulence."
Cuomo's calling it the New York Hate Crime Anti-Terrorism Act. It would create an unprecedented criminal charge in New York of a domestic act of terrorism motivated by hate. The crime would be a class A1 felony and carry a sentence of life in prison without parole.
Prosecutors would have to meet a specific burden to convict individuals on the new charge. It would have to be shown that the alleged perpetrator intended to cause the death of at least five people and successfully killed at least one person.
Prosecutors would also have to show the attack was motivated by the race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation of the victims.
It wouldn't matter if those characteristics actually matched the victim, or were just perceived as much by the perpetrator. The charge would be valid if the perpetrator perceived someone to be of a certain religion, for example, even if they weren't.
That's different from what Cuomo proposed in August to criminalize domestic terrorism in New York.
Cuomo's previous proposal would have assigned the charge to any incident, motivated by hate, that results in the murder of at least one person and the attempted murder of at least two people. The new proposal appears to provide a narrower path for the charge.
Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, said after Cuomo's address Wednesday that he would bring the idea to members of his conference, who haven't yet had a chance to seriously consider the measure.
"There has to be a lot of criteria that has to be in it," Heastie said. "This is something he proposed last year, but we'll talk it over with the conference."
READ MORE:
Monsey Stabbing Suspect's Attorney Cites Mental Illness; Cuomo Says Domestic Terrorism Fueled Attack
At NYC Bar, Cuomo Proposes New Domestic Terrorism Charge in NY State Law
Judiciary Chairs in NY Legislature Plan Busy Legislative Session With List of 2020 Priorities
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250