Cuomo Details Proposal for New Domestic Terrorism Criminal Charge to NY Penal Law
Cuomo will now have the chance to pitch the idea to state lawmakers, who have said they're open to discussing the idea as part of this year's legislative session.
January 08, 2020 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo unveiled details Wednesday on his plan to create a new criminal charge of domestic terrorism, which is intended to be used by prosecutors when someone attempts to kill several people based on their race, religion or other identifiable factors.
"Let's acknowledge displays of hate-filled mass violence for what they are," Cuomo said. "They are domestic terrorism. That's what they are."
Cuomo first proposed the idea last year after the perpetrator of a mass shooting in El Paso, Texas, told police he was targeting Mexicans in the attack.
That was in August, when the state Legislature wasn't in session.
Cuomo will now have the chance to pitch the idea to state lawmakers, who have said they're open to discussing the idea as part of this year's legislative session.
The idea was fueled in recent weeks by an attack in Rockland County, where a man broke into a rabbi's home in Monsey and stabbed five people. One of those victims is still in a coma, and the family has said he's not expected to wake up.
Cuomo formally presented the proposal Wednesday at his State of the State address in Albany, which he began by decrying political divisions.
"Every day our people are besieged by crises, upheaval and unrest," Cuomo said. "These are the ugly signs of our times. The forecast suggests it will get worse before it gets better. The year ahead will not calm the waters but rather increase the turbulence."
Cuomo's calling it the New York Hate Crime Anti-Terrorism Act. It would create an unprecedented criminal charge in New York of a domestic act of terrorism motivated by hate. The crime would be a class A1 felony and carry a sentence of life in prison without parole.
Prosecutors would have to meet a specific burden to convict individuals on the new charge. It would have to be shown that the alleged perpetrator intended to cause the death of at least five people and successfully killed at least one person.
Prosecutors would also have to show the attack was motivated by the race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation of the victims.
It wouldn't matter if those characteristics actually matched the victim, or were just perceived as much by the perpetrator. The charge would be valid if the perpetrator perceived someone to be of a certain religion, for example, even if they weren't.
That's different from what Cuomo proposed in August to criminalize domestic terrorism in New York.
Cuomo's previous proposal would have assigned the charge to any incident, motivated by hate, that results in the murder of at least one person and the attempted murder of at least two people. The new proposal appears to provide a narrower path for the charge.
Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, said after Cuomo's address Wednesday that he would bring the idea to members of his conference, who haven't yet had a chance to seriously consider the measure.
"There has to be a lot of criteria that has to be in it," Heastie said. "This is something he proposed last year, but we'll talk it over with the conference."
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
- 2Judge Orders Prosecution to Destroy Copies of Notes Found in Sean Combs' Prison Cell
- 3BIT Mining Bribery Scandal Highlights Trump-Biden Enforcement Gap
- 4AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
- 5Cyberattacks Slowing Down M&A Deals, Firm Report Finds
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250