Cuomo Renews Effort to Legalize Marijuana in NY After Legislation Failed Last Year
Lawmakers may be more motivated to set aside their differences on marijuana legalization this year to help fill the state's ever-growing budget deficit.
January 08, 2020 at 02:59 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo is taking a second shot this year at legalizing marijuana in New York for adult recreational use, with a plan unveiled during his State of the State address Wednesday that appeared to largely mirror what he proposed last year.
But this year, Cuomo is also seeking to have New York work with its geographical neighbors to coordinate a comprehensive system for legalizing marijuana.
After Democrats took control of both chambers of the state Legislature last year for the first time in nearly a decade, they appeared poised to legalize marijuana. That didn't happen for several reasons, including disagreement on where revenue from sales should be diverted.
Cuomo's office said in a written version of the proposal alongside his speech Wednesday that his plan has the potential to generate $300 million in tax revenue annually.
Lawmakers may be more motivated to set aside their differences on marijuana legalization this year to help fill the state's ever-growing budget deficit. New York is heading into the new year with a budget gap of $6.1 billion.
Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, said after Cuomo's address Wednesday that he was optimistic lawmakers could approve a marijuana legalization bill this year, as long as it meets certain criteria that could be supported by his colleagues.
"I would hope so. It's another revenue stream. But as I always said it has to be done in the right way, and to me the first component is making it up to the communities hit hardest by the decriminalization of marijuana," Heastie said.
But there are questions that remain with marijuana legalization, which prevented lawmakers from coming to an agreement last year.
Among them was traffic safety. Some lawmakers wanted revenue from marijuana sales to be diverted largely to law enforcement, which would be tasked with determining when drivers are intoxicated by the drug. Many aren't trained to do that, law enforcement groups have said.
Other lawmakers wanted revenue from marijuana sales to be largely invested in communities who have been disproportionately impacted by the state's laws criminalizing marijuana. Those have historically been communities of color.
Cuomo's proposal Tuesday didn't say, exactly, where revenue from marijuana sales would go. But it did say that funds should be invested in research and direct resources to harm reduction, treatment and prevention providers.
The proposal would also create a statewide education campaign that communicates the potential health risks of using marijuana that exist for vulnerable populations. It would also create a campaign to prevent driving while impaired on the drug.
Cuomo's proposal, like others, would also include oversight of the cannabis industry from a newly formed Office of Cannabis Management. The office would oversee packaging, labeling, advertising and testing of all products. Sales would be limited to adults 21 and over.
Democrats in the Legislature had rallied around a different proposal near the end of last year's legislative session that included some differences from Cuomo's proposal. They failed to gain support from their colleagues before session ended for the year in June.
Lawmakers, instead, agreed to decriminalize marijuana for low-level possession, meaning those charges were reduced from a misdemeanor to a violation, and that fines were significantly lowered in the process. It also provided a mechanism for expungement of those convictions.
Cuomo and the Legislature are expected to debate marijuana legalization, again, as part of this year's state budget. That spending plan is due at the end of March.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1On Advice of DOJ Office, Special Counsel Moves To End Trump Prosecution
- 2Stars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ for US Success
- 3Elaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
- 4How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 5When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250