Judge Refuses to Recuse Himself in Harvey Weinstein Criminal Trial
Burke thanked the defense team for giving him the chance to clarify, explaining that judges can use strong and even hyperbolic language to prevent defendants from continuing to violate court orders.
January 09, 2020 at 11:08 AM
3 minute read
Judge James Burke has refused to recuse himself from former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein's Manhattan criminal trial, he announced in court Thursday.
Weinstein's defense lawyers asked Burke to recuse himself Wednesday, which was the second day of jury selection in the case. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty to charges of rape and predatory sexual assault.
In the recusal motion, attorney Arthur Aidala of Aidala Bertuna & Kamins argued that Burke made prejudicial statements while scolding Weinstein for using a cellphone in court.
On Tuesday morning, Burke asked Weinstein if the cellphone use was "really the way you want to end up in jail for the rest of your life," after several previous incidents involving the phones.
Burke thanked the defense team for giving him the chance to clarify, explaining that judges can use strong and even hyperbolic language to prevent defendants from continuing to violate court orders.
"I certainly never actually meant that I was going to put your client in jail for life nor did I mean, because I have not, that I have prejudged whether he is guilty or not guilty or innocent of the charges nor what his sentence would be [if he's found guilty]," Burke said.
Burke heard brief oral arguments from each side Thursday before deliberating on the recusal motion for about 20 minutes.
Joan Illuzzi-Orbon, the lead prosecutor in the case, told Burke that the Manhattan DA's office strongly objected to the motion for recusal.
Burke's rulings and behavior have been balanced, Illuzzi-Orbon said. She noted that Weinstein's defense lawyers frequently say they're concerned about the volume of media coverage in the case, but the lawyers often speak to the press themselves, she said.
"They make that request every single day, that they don't want news, but that doesn't mean it's a sound motion to be made," she said. Burke earlier this week rejected a request from Illuzzi-Orbon herself to forbid the defense team from talking to the press during the trial.
Aidala also made a series of specific requests in his motion, asking for more time for voir dire among other issues.
Burke dismissed those matters, telling Aidala he's repeatedly said that the jury selection timeline can be adjusted if necessary later on.
He also rejected the idea that the trial has, so far, had a "carnival atmosphere." While many people are interested in the case, Burke said the crowds at the courthouse have been well-behaved and quiet.
"Today, this morning, this courtroom is more than half empty," Burke said after briefly scanning the room.
READ MORE:
Lawyers for Harvey Weinstein Call for NY Judge's Recusal in Criminal Trial
Will Lawyer David Boies Be a Witness in Harvey Weinstein's Sex Crimes Trial?
Harvey Weinstein Charged in Los Angeles as New York Trial Begins
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Just Ahead of Oral Argument, Fubo Settles Antitrust Case with Disney, Fox, Warner Bros.
Trending Stories
- 1Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 2‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 3State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 4Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
- 522-Count Indictment Is Just the Start of SCOTUSBlog Atty's Legal Problems, Experts Say
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250