Westchester City Court Judge Censured After Acting as Daughter's Attorney in Court
Edwards not only represented his daughter in family court, he also invoked his position as a judge on more than one occasion to demonstrate his knowledge of the law.
January 10, 2020 at 03:33 PM
4 minute read
A full-time city court judge in Mount Vernon received a rebuke Friday from the state's disciplinary body for jurists after he was found to have acted as his daughter's attorney during multiple family court appearances in Albany.
City Court Judge William Edwards, an attorney, agreed to be censured Friday by the state Commission on Judicial Conduct.
Edwards not only represented his daughter in family court, he also invoked his position as a judge on more than one occasion to demonstrate his knowledge of the law, according to the commission. His comments were most extensive during an appearance in 2015.
"I'm very active, the City Court judge in Mount Vernon, we have a large number of cases, murders, everything else," Edwards said during that appearance, according to the commission. "I've been in Family Court for five years. I appreciate the experience that you go through as a Family Court judge but this is nonsensical."
Edwards was at the time seeking to have a petition dismissed against his daughter, who isn't named. The judge ended up dismissing the petition, with prejudice.
Four months later, Edwards appeared in Albany County Family Court again on behalf of his daughter who, this time, was petitioning for an order of protection against an unnamed individual. That individual wasn't in court.
Edwards appeared to suggest, at the time, that he was aware he couldn't practice law while serving as a full-time judge. But he also said there was an exception for family members. There isn't, according to the commission.
"Now I'm her father as well as an attorney but I'm actually a judge," Edwards said. "I can't practice law except in my own family cases."
He went on to tell the judge in the proceeding that he knew, based on his experience on the bench, that without legal protection, his daughter would likely be repeatedly approached by the individual against which she was seeking an order.
His daughter was granted an order of protection and the case was adjourned for a month. At a third appearance, Edwards, again, acted as his daughter's attorney. Nothing came of that appearance.
A month later, Edwards was told by Judge Sam Walker, the supervising judge for the city courts of the Ninth Judicial District, that he wasn't allowed to practice law at all while also serving as a full-time judge, per the rules of judicial conduct.
Edwards then hired an attorney for his daughter, who was able to resolve her matter shortly after.
Commission Administrator Robert Tembeckjian said that Edwards, to his credit, admitted wrongdoing when the panel began its probe into his conduct. The commission decided he deserves another chance, Tembeckjian said.
"It is bad enough for a full-time judge to practice law, even on behalf of a family member," Tembeckjian said. "Repeatedly mentioning one's own judicial status during the proceedings compounds the original misconduct and comes across as an obvious attempt to influence the trial judge."
"Here, Judge Edwards has admitted wrongdoing, and the Commission believes he deserves another chance," he continued.
One member of the commission wasn't quite as forgiving. Marvin Ray Raskin, who was appointed to the panel by Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, wrote in a separate opinion that he would have kicked Edwards off the bench.
"I find unavailing respondent's assertion that he was unaware his representation contravened established prohibitions," Raskin said. "Respondent's conduct was neither inadvertent nor miscalculated. Rather, it was purposeful and strategic."
Edwards was represented before the Commission on Judicial Conduct by Amy Bellantoni from Bellantoni Law in Scarsdale. Bellantoni declined to comment Friday.
Edwards has been on the bench in Mount Vernon since 2003. His current term is scheduled to end in 2023.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commentary: James Madison, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 2The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
- 3Leopard Solutions Launches AI Navigator, a Gen AI Search, Data Extraction Tool
- 4Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 5Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250