Pierce Bainbridge Dusts Off Arbitration Clause in Fight With Ex-Partner
Nearly eight months after Pierce Bainbridge and its former partner Donald Lewis traded public allegations of extreme misconduct, the law firm said it just learned that Lewis signed an arbitration agreement.
January 13, 2020 at 02:02 PM
4 minute read
Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht and its former partner Donald Lewis have been battling each other for nearly 10 months over the circumstances of Lewis' departure from the firm. And the parties have been locked in court since May, with dueling lawsuits packed with scandalous allegations filed in New York and California.
Now Pierce Bainbridge contends the dispute never belonged in court.
The law firm, in court documents filed Friday in Manhattan Supreme Court, requested that Lewis' allegations be arbitrated based on an agreement that it just discovered. The firm said that it realized only last month that Lewis signed a "worksite employee acknowledgment," or WEA, in the course of his onboarding process that includes an agreement to arbitrate with Pierce Bainbridge.
"The WEA signed by Donald Lewis was kept in his personnel file," Pierce Bainbridge's human resources director Dana Glass said in an affidavit filed on Friday, "but to my knowledge and belief, neither the firm nor its counsel in this action performed a comprehensive review of each of the documents in the personnel file until mid-December 2019 when another firm partner reviewed a copy of his own WEA and noted the arbitration provision contained therein."
The dispute between Pierce Bainbridge and Lewis was publicly aired in May when Lewis sued the firm, several partners and its outside counsel at Putney, Twombly, Hall & Hirson in New York. Lewis claimed he was illegally terminated following a false accusation of sexual assault because he raised questions about global managing partner John Pierce's use of borrowed money.
Pierce Bainbridge then sued Lewis in Los Angeles, claiming extortion and defamation; that case has since been dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.
In the Friday court documents in the New York case, Pierce Bainbridge's lawyers at Mukasey Frenchman & Sklaroff argued Lewis faced no prejudice with the firm invoking the arbitration agreement after several months of litigation. No discovery has taken place, the firm filed its motion to dismiss Lewis' suit on Dec. 9, and the case is only in its "very early stages," the firm argued.
The law firm defendants initially sought dismissal in July, but they filed new motions to toss the case after Lewis filed an amended complaint in October.
As of Monday, Pierce Bainbridge had not filed a motion to compel Lewis' second suit against the firm, filed in June in New York, in which Lewis accused John Pierce, lawyers at Littler Mendelson and others of defamation in connection with their responses to his first suit.
Earlier this month, a woman using a "Jane Doe" pseudonym who claims she is a victim of the alleged sexual assault that led to Lewis' termination requested the court seal the record of the second case, or parts of it, and prevent the use of her name in public documents.
Neal Brickman, who represents Lewis, said in an email that his client would oppose the push for arbitration, partly because, he said, Pierce Bainbridge has already waived its right to arbitrate by suing Lewis over the same set of allegations. Brickman declined to comment on the Jane Doe filing.
Lewis said in an email that Pierce Bainbridge's claim to have just found the arbitration clause is "not credible," as the firm was recently arbitrating with another former partner. He said the firm wants to "cover…up" his allegations and evidence of wrongdoing.
Marc Mukasey, who represents the Pierce Bainbridge defendants, and John Pierce didn't immediately respond to comment requests on Monday.
|Read More
Pierce Bainbridge Extortion Suit Against Ex-Partner Tentatively Tossed, but Fight Continues
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250