NY Lawmakers Seek Statutory Right to Counsel for Immigrants Facing Deportation
The idea was first proposed by the New York State Bar Association last year at the tail end of the legislative session.
January 15, 2020 at 12:21 PM
5 minute read
Key Democrats in the New York Legislature have proposed a bill that would require access to an attorney for any resident of New York facing deportation, regardless of whether that individual is lawfully residing in the country, in a move that's also supported by the New York State Bar Association.
The Access to Representation Act, introduced Wednesday, would provide a statutory right to counsel for indigent individuals facing deportation.
It's sponsored by Assemblywoman Catalina Cruz, D-Queens, and State Sen. Brad Hoylman, a Democrat from Manhattan who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee. Hoylman said Tuesday that data on immigration proceedings supports their effort.
"For an immigrant facing deportation, having an attorney on their case can be the difference between staying in New York or being separated from their family: 78% of immigrants with attorneys win their cases, while only 15% of immigrants without attorneys are successful," Hoylman said.
The right to an attorney is currently provided statutorily for individuals facing criminal charges in the U.S., regardless of their immigration status. Cruz said the same right should be extended to immigrants facing deportation, even though those matters are considered civil.
"While immigration law is civil in nature, the consequences of violating the law are the same as those faced by criminal defendants—loss of liberty, forced separation from family or worse, death—when forced to return to a country that persecutes their very existence," Cruz said.
The idea was first proposed by the State Bar Association last year at the tail end of the legislative session. It was developed by the State Bar's Committee on Immigration Representation and adopted by the organization's governing body in June.
Hank Greenberg, the current president of the State Bar Association and a shareholder at Greenberg Traurig, told the New York Law Journal in late December that the measure would be among their top legislative priorities this year. He said the same Wednesday.
"NYSBA has a long tradition of advocating for fair treatment and equal access to justice for all," Greenberg said. "We look forward to working with them to help this legislation be enacted into New York State law and to continuing to help ensure that immigrants have access to the legal services they need."
Attorneys are currently available to immigrants at no cost from civil legal services groups, but the workload of those organizations largely depends on the amount of funding they're given from the state and local governments.
New York has the Liberty Defense Project, for example, which provides state funding to private law firms, bar associations and other entities to support legal services for the state's immigrant population.
The new law proposed by Hoylman and Cruz Wednesday would, essentially, remove money from the conversation on funding legal representation for deportation proceedings.
As a statutory right, the legislation would require that the state pay for any legal representation needed by immigrants facing deportation. That right would only be guaranteed below a certain income threshold, which wasn't immediately available Wednesday.
That strategy is intended to prevent obstacles in the state budget, like this year's $6.1 billion budget deficit, from stifling public funding for legal services targeted toward deportation proceedings.
Democrats on Wednesday did not include an estimated annual cost of the legislation in their announcement of the measure. The State Bar Association did not include such an estimate in their report supporting the idea last year.
The legislation is supported by the New York Immigration Coalition, an advocacy group focused on immigration-related issues. The NYIC was also a plaintiff in litigation against the Trump administration, in recent years, over a citizenship question on the 2020 U.S. Census.
Steven Choi, executive director of the NYIC, said the legislation will help combat increased efforts from the Trump administration to deport undocumented immigrants.
"Today, more New Yorkers are at heightened risk of deportation from the Trump administration's voracious targeting of immigrants," Choi said. "We need bold action from New York State to protect our immigrant communities."
Bill language on the legislation wasn't immediately available Wednesday, but Hoylman's office said in a news release that the measure would provide a constitutional right to an attorney for immigrants facing deportation.
The measure, however, would not amend the state constitution. According to a summary of the bill, it would amend the executive law to require the director of the state Office of New Americans to administer a right to counsel program.
READ MORE:
Move to Bar ICE Arrests at State Courthouses Gains Momentum Among NY Lawmakers
NY Bar Association Wants Every Immigrant Facing Deportation to Have an Attorney
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250