Lawmakers Seek to Compensate Emotional Loss Through Overhaul of Wrongful Death Statute
"Essentially, our legal system values the life of wealthy individuals more than a child or a senior, or a person with a disability," State Sen. Brad Hoylman said.
January 16, 2020 at 01:57 PM
5 minute read
Lawmakers in New York are seeking to expand the state's wrongful death statute to allow compensation for things like grief or loss of love and companionship in this year's legislative session.
The state's current laws only allow individuals to seek compensation based on the amount of potential income lost from the death of a loved one, which can often place limits on litigation.
They can also seek damages for pain and suffering, but the legislation before lawmakers in New York would expand the list of compensable factors to include items not currently considered by a jury when evaluating a case.
It's sponsored by Assemblywoman Helene Weinstein, D-Brooklyn, and state Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee.
"Courts only consider the economic importance of the deceased through lost income potential," Hoylman said. "Essentially, our legal system values the life of wealthy individuals more than a child or a senior, or a person with a disability."
The legislation would allow individuals to seek compensation for loss of love, society, protection, comfort, companionship and consortium resulting from the death of a loved one, according to the bill text. It would also allow damages for grief or anguish caused by the death.
That would be on top of any pecuniary damages that would result from the death, like loss of potential income, support or any diminishment of inheritance.
The bill also lists other factors that would be valid for seeking compensation under the wrongful death statute, like loss of nurture, guidance, counsel, advice, training and education. Essentially, the legislation would allow compensation for emotional loss.
"New York is one of only nine states that doesn't allow surviving family members to recover non-economic damages as part of a wrongful death suit," Hoylman said.
That means, as Hoylman said, that loved ones can often go uncompensated when someone is killed, but has no tangible economic value. When a child or aging parent dies, for example, someone can't seek damages for emotional loss from the person or entity responsible.
The idea has been a priority in recent years of the New York State Trial Lawyers Association, which is known to be a powerful advocacy force on legal issues.
Judith Livingston, a senior partner with Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore and executive committee member of the Trial Lawyers Association, said the state's current wrongful death statute isn't fair to indigent individuals.
"New York's outdated wrongful death statute inherently favors the wealthy at the expense of working families, stay-at-home parents, retired or disabled individuals and children," Livingston said. "The value of one's life is far more than their salary or wages for those that are working, especially when someone is deemed responsible for their death by a court of law."
For areas like loss of income, it can be easy to imagine how attorneys would quantify such an amount. For other factors, like loss of love, such a calculation can be less clear for individuals who don't practice law. There's no formula for doing so in the legislation.
David Perecman, a personal injury attorney from New York City, said that decision is left up to the jury, or judge, with some help from attorneys.
"The answer is that you go in a room, talk to your fellow jurors, sometimes listen to suggestions from attorneys, and you come up with a number," Percman said. "Those numbers will ultimately be subject to review by the court. If people give crazy numbers, the court will knock them down."
Percman said his clients are often perplexed when he tells them New York law doesn't allow compensation in a wrongful death suit outside of pecuniary damages and pain and suffering. Parents who've lost their children are particularly stunned, he said.
"They don't believe you at times. Many of them are shocked," Percman said. "I've had cases that involve the death of children, and that is a case where our current archaic wrongful death law has its worst toll because children don't make money."
The bill from Hoylman and Weinstein would change that. Anyone would be able to bring a wrongful death suit against a person or entity for damages and compensation related to emotional value. Parents who lose their children could seek compensation, for example.
It's far from the first time the idea has been proposed. The bill has been floated for more than two decades, with little appetite from lawmakers.
Hoylman first took it on last year after Democrats gained a majority in the State Senate for the first time in nearly a decade. Weinstein's had the legislation longer. It's failed to pass either chamber in recent years, but lawmakers are making another go at it this year.
It's currently in the Codes Committee in the state Assembly and the Judiciary Committee in the state Senate. With Hoylman at the helm of the latter committee, the legislation is likely to move, but a majority of lawmakers have yet to make a firm commitment on the measure.
This year's legislative session runs through early June.
READ MORE:
New President of NY Trial Lawyers Association Calls Wrongful Death Statute Antiquated
Review of Personal Injury Awards: Questioning Reasonable Compensation
NYC Files Lawsuit Against Con Ed to Pay Legal Fees, Defend Harlem Gas Explosion Case
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 2Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 3K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 4'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 5Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250