Parnas' Attorney Wants His Client to Tell Congress All About Ukraine Scheme, in Possible Bid for Reduced Sentence if Convicted
Prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, Joseph Bondy said, had rebuffed Parnas' earlier requests to provide information related to charges that he had funneled foreign money into U.S. elections, and Parnas was now prepared to take his story public, in the hope that it could help his criminal case.
January 16, 2020 at 07:29 PM
5 minute read
The attorney for Lev Parnas, the ex-Rudy Giuliani associate now charged with federal campaign-finance violations, told the New York Law Journal on Thursday his client wants to tell his story to Congress in an effort, partly, to mitigate any sentence he might receive in federal court.
Joseph Bondy, Parnas' Manhattan-based criminal defense counsel, said his client and federal prosecutors are at an impasse, after earlier attempts to provide information to the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office were rebuffed.
Parnas, whose work in Ukraine landed him at the center of the presidential impeachment inquiry, was "trying very hard" to be a congressional witness at Trump's Senate impeachment trial, which is scheduled to start in earnest next week, he said.
"In the event that there ever was a conviction, the hope would be that his efforts in providing substantial assistance to Congress would warrant a reduced sentence," Bondy told the Law Journal.
Prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, he said, had refused Parnas' earlier proffers related to charges that he had funneled foreign money into U.S. elections, and Parnas was now prepared to take his story public in the hope that it could help his criminal case.
Southern District prosecutors would be unlikely to agree to a downward variance in sentencing, but a federal judge in sentencing could consider any help Parnas potentially gives to Congress.
Parnas, a Soviet-born associate of Giuliani, in an interview with MSNBC's Rachel Maddow on Wednesday implicated Trump, Vice President Mike Pence and U.S. Attorney General William Barr in the wide-reaching effort to dig up damaging information on Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden.
The second part of Parnas' sit-down with Maddow is slated to air Thursday night, along with an interview he recorded Wednesday with Anderson Cooper.
According to Parnas, Trump and others in the administration "knew exactly what was going on," while Parnas was "on the ground, doing their work."
Trump, Pence and the Justice Department have all denied the allegations.
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York declined to comment.
Parnas was arrested in October at Washington Dulles International Airport with a one-way ticket while waiting to board a plane with a one-way ticket to Vienna.
Prosecutors alleged in a 21-page indictment that Parnas and fellow Giuliani associate Igor Fruman made illegal donations to buy political influence and then worked to conceal their scheme from candidates, campaigns and federal regulators by laundering money through bank accounts in the names of limited liability companies and through the use of straw donors.
Both Parnas and Fruman have pleaded not guilty to four counts of conspiracy, falsification of records and making false statements to the Federal Election Commission.
Parnas, who has repeatedly maintained his innocence, has been signaling that he wants to be subpoenaed in the impeachment inquiry, and Bondy recently won a court order from U.S. District Judge Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York allowing the defense to turn over records to congressional investigators.
Parnas' explosive comments, on the eve of the impeachment trial, stirred speculation about the strategy behind Parnas' ongoing media blitz.
Sources contacted Thursday said the public campaign appeared to be part of a concerted strategy to gain a foothold with prosecutors overseeing his case or, failing that, to lay the groundwork for congressional testimony in a bid for leniency in his sentencing, if he is ultimately convicted on the charges.
It was seen as unlikely that the move would succeed in reopening talks aimed at securing any kind of a cooperation agreement with prosecutors, which could potentially limit his exposure to criminal charges.
The Southern District is known for its hard-line policy, which requires would-be cooperators to admit to all crimes they may have committed, even those the government does not know about. The demanding nature of the process is designed to allow prosecutors to fully assess the credibility of potential cooperators and to screen any complications that could jeopardize a case at trial.
Attorneys on Thursday questioned whether Parnas' statements to date had conveyed the full extent of his involvement in the Ukraine scandal and his relationship with others involved in the pressure campaign and said he stood little chance of striking a deal with prosecutors.
"I think Lev Parnas cannot cooperate in the way SDNY prosecutors need him to, which is to come to Jesus about everything," said Kan Nawaday, a former Southern District prosecutor, who is now a partner with Venable in New York.
Michael Bachner, of Bachner and Weiner, said Bondy and Parnas had been "pretty overt" about their strategy, but noted that they were playing a risky game.
"It's a pretty unusual tactic because it means Parnas has to be willing to enter a guilty plea," Bachner said. "Parnas is in a way saying that he's willing to enter a plea in the Southern District case."
Bondy said Thursday that he was not giving up any of his defenses and planned to beat the charges in court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250