Parnas' Attorney Wants His Client to Tell Congress All About Ukraine Scheme, in Possible Bid for Reduced Sentence if Convicted
Prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, Joseph Bondy said, had rebuffed Parnas' earlier requests to provide information related to charges that he had funneled foreign money into U.S. elections, and Parnas was now prepared to take his story public, in the hope that it could help his criminal case.
January 16, 2020 at 07:29 PM
5 minute read
The attorney for Lev Parnas, the ex-Rudy Giuliani associate now charged with federal campaign-finance violations, told the New York Law Journal on Thursday his client wants to tell his story to Congress in an effort, partly, to mitigate any sentence he might receive in federal court.
Joseph Bondy, Parnas' Manhattan-based criminal defense counsel, said his client and federal prosecutors are at an impasse, after earlier attempts to provide information to the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office were rebuffed.
Parnas, whose work in Ukraine landed him at the center of the presidential impeachment inquiry, was "trying very hard" to be a congressional witness at Trump's Senate impeachment trial, which is scheduled to start in earnest next week, he said.
"In the event that there ever was a conviction, the hope would be that his efforts in providing substantial assistance to Congress would warrant a reduced sentence," Bondy told the Law Journal.
Prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, he said, had refused Parnas' earlier proffers related to charges that he had funneled foreign money into U.S. elections, and Parnas was now prepared to take his story public in the hope that it could help his criminal case.
Southern District prosecutors would be unlikely to agree to a downward variance in sentencing, but a federal judge in sentencing could consider any help Parnas potentially gives to Congress.
Parnas, a Soviet-born associate of Giuliani, in an interview with MSNBC's Rachel Maddow on Wednesday implicated Trump, Vice President Mike Pence and U.S. Attorney General William Barr in the wide-reaching effort to dig up damaging information on Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden.
The second part of Parnas' sit-down with Maddow is slated to air Thursday night, along with an interview he recorded Wednesday with Anderson Cooper.
According to Parnas, Trump and others in the administration "knew exactly what was going on," while Parnas was "on the ground, doing their work."
Trump, Pence and the Justice Department have all denied the allegations.
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York declined to comment.
Parnas was arrested in October at Washington Dulles International Airport with a one-way ticket while waiting to board a plane with a one-way ticket to Vienna.
Prosecutors alleged in a 21-page indictment that Parnas and fellow Giuliani associate Igor Fruman made illegal donations to buy political influence and then worked to conceal their scheme from candidates, campaigns and federal regulators by laundering money through bank accounts in the names of limited liability companies and through the use of straw donors.
Both Parnas and Fruman have pleaded not guilty to four counts of conspiracy, falsification of records and making false statements to the Federal Election Commission.
Parnas, who has repeatedly maintained his innocence, has been signaling that he wants to be subpoenaed in the impeachment inquiry, and Bondy recently won a court order from U.S. District Judge Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York allowing the defense to turn over records to congressional investigators.
Parnas' explosive comments, on the eve of the impeachment trial, stirred speculation about the strategy behind Parnas' ongoing media blitz.
Sources contacted Thursday said the public campaign appeared to be part of a concerted strategy to gain a foothold with prosecutors overseeing his case or, failing that, to lay the groundwork for congressional testimony in a bid for leniency in his sentencing, if he is ultimately convicted on the charges.
It was seen as unlikely that the move would succeed in reopening talks aimed at securing any kind of a cooperation agreement with prosecutors, which could potentially limit his exposure to criminal charges.
The Southern District is known for its hard-line policy, which requires would-be cooperators to admit to all crimes they may have committed, even those the government does not know about. The demanding nature of the process is designed to allow prosecutors to fully assess the credibility of potential cooperators and to screen any complications that could jeopardize a case at trial.
Attorneys on Thursday questioned whether Parnas' statements to date had conveyed the full extent of his involvement in the Ukraine scandal and his relationship with others involved in the pressure campaign and said he stood little chance of striking a deal with prosecutors.
"I think Lev Parnas cannot cooperate in the way SDNY prosecutors need him to, which is to come to Jesus about everything," said Kan Nawaday, a former Southern District prosecutor, who is now a partner with Venable in New York.
Michael Bachner, of Bachner and Weiner, said Bondy and Parnas had been "pretty overt" about their strategy, but noted that they were playing a risky game.
"It's a pretty unusual tactic because it means Parnas has to be willing to enter a guilty plea," Bachner said. "Parnas is in a way saying that he's willing to enter a plea in the Southern District case."
Bondy said Thursday that he was not giving up any of his defenses and planned to beat the charges in court.
Read More:
Giuliani-Linked Defendant Parnas to Remain Free on Bail as Judge Rejects Prosecutors' Bid to Revoke
Lawyer for Giuliani-Linked Defendant Cites Executive Privilege Issue in Campaign Finance Case
Federal Prosecutors Charge 2 Men With Giuliani Ties in Campaign-Finance Violation Probe
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 2Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 3CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 4Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 5Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250