7 Men, 5 Women Will Sit as Jury in Harvey Weinstein's New York Rape Trial
Weinstein's attorneys asked pointed questions about sex during jury selection, hinting at allegations that are likely to come up during the trial.
January 17, 2020 at 12:25 PM
3 minute read
Seven men and five women were chosen as jurors in the trial of former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, who pleaded not guilty to charges of predatory sexual assault and rape in Manhattan.
After a juror prescreening process that lasted more than a week, the jury was seated in just a day and a half. Three alternates—a man and two women—were also seated at midday Friday. Arguments are expected to begin Wednesday.
Prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon accused Weinstein's defense team of systematically eliminating white women from the jury box, while Weinstein's lawyers argued they had other reasons for eliminating jurors who match that description. Just before lunchtime Friday, two white women were seated as the 11th and 12th jurors.
Weinstein's attorneys asked pointed questions about sex during jury selection, hinting at allegations that are likely to come up during the trial.
"Who here thinks that someone could have consensual sexual relations with someone at work to get ahead at work?" Arthur Aidala of Aidala Bertuna & Kamins asked Friday. Several jurors raised their hands.
A question from another Weinstein defense lawyer, Damon Cheronis, involved a similar theme.
"Does anybody think an individual could have sex with someone that they may not find attractive for reasons other than love?" Cheronis asked Thursday.
Cheronis also asked jurors whether they believed someone could have consensual sex and then, years later, declare it was not consensual.
Manhattan Criminal Court Judge James Burke has told jurors that the trial is not a referendum on #MeToo, sexual harassment or women's rights and that they should consider only the evidence they hear in the courtroom.
Just after the full jury was seated, the defense team asked Burke to declare a mistrial. They argued that one juror, who has a novel coming out soon, had not been honest about the content of her book.
Illuzzi-Orbon said the woman had honestly told the lawyers that the novel focuses on the lives of young women, but the defense team focused on a reference on the book's website about the characters confronting "predatory older men."
"She was not forthcoming about the book, about the subject of the book," Cheronis said. "She lied about it all."
Burke denied the defense challenge for cause against the juror but did not immediately rule on the request for a mistrial.
Read more:
Harvey Weinstein Charged in Los Angeles as New York Trial Begins
Will Lawyer David Boies Be a Witness in Harvey Weinstein's Sex Crimes Trial?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWalt Disney, IBM Denied High Court Review of Old NY Franchise Tax Law
3 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Just Ahead of Oral Argument, Fubo Settles Antitrust Case with Disney, Fox, Warner Bros.
Trending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250