7 Men, 5 Women Will Sit as Jury in Harvey Weinstein's New York Rape Trial
Weinstein's attorneys asked pointed questions about sex during jury selection, hinting at allegations that are likely to come up during the trial.
January 17, 2020 at 12:25 PM
3 minute read
Seven men and five women were chosen as jurors in the trial of former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, who pleaded not guilty to charges of predatory sexual assault and rape in Manhattan.
After a juror prescreening process that lasted more than a week, the jury was seated in just a day and a half. Three alternates—a man and two women—were also seated at midday Friday. Arguments are expected to begin Wednesday.
Prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon accused Weinstein's defense team of systematically eliminating white women from the jury box, while Weinstein's lawyers argued they had other reasons for eliminating jurors who match that description. Just before lunchtime Friday, two white women were seated as the 11th and 12th jurors.
Weinstein's attorneys asked pointed questions about sex during jury selection, hinting at allegations that are likely to come up during the trial.
"Who here thinks that someone could have consensual sexual relations with someone at work to get ahead at work?" Arthur Aidala of Aidala Bertuna & Kamins asked Friday. Several jurors raised their hands.
A question from another Weinstein defense lawyer, Damon Cheronis, involved a similar theme.
"Does anybody think an individual could have sex with someone that they may not find attractive for reasons other than love?" Cheronis asked Thursday.
Cheronis also asked jurors whether they believed someone could have consensual sex and then, years later, declare it was not consensual.
Manhattan Criminal Court Judge James Burke has told jurors that the trial is not a referendum on #MeToo, sexual harassment or women's rights and that they should consider only the evidence they hear in the courtroom.
Just after the full jury was seated, the defense team asked Burke to declare a mistrial. They argued that one juror, who has a novel coming out soon, had not been honest about the content of her book.
Illuzzi-Orbon said the woman had honestly told the lawyers that the novel focuses on the lives of young women, but the defense team focused on a reference on the book's website about the characters confronting "predatory older men."
"She was not forthcoming about the book, about the subject of the book," Cheronis said. "She lied about it all."
Burke denied the defense challenge for cause against the juror but did not immediately rule on the request for a mistrial.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSoundCloud GC Takes Legal Reins of Condé Nast at Tumultuous Time
With SDNY Stay Lifted, Sex Trafficking Civil Suit Against Vince McMahon, WWE Gets Green Light
3 minute readBig Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250