There Needs To Be a Plan
While perhaps well intentioned, the bail reform act has had drastic consequences for all those involved. There have been numerous cases of those being arrested only to be released and commit another crime.
January 17, 2020 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
While perhaps well intentioned, the bail reform act has had drastic consequences for all those involved. There have been numerous cases of those being arrested only to be released and commit another crime. Understandably, there has been a call for repealing the bail reform measures. While this is warranted, the legislature must explore why the law has failed and not implement draconian measures in response to the public outrage.
Clearly, there was not enough contemplation in the implementation of the law. Similarly, when New York State began to close State Psychiatric Hospitals in the 1960s, there were no plans in place to provide mental health services in the community. Consequently, the local jails became the largest inpatient mental health providers in New York. Some local jails became a place where those arrested were afforded an opportunity to have a respite from the community. They were provided food, shelter, medical, mental health and substance abuse treatment. These sources are clearly lacking in the community. It has been suggested that often people commit crimes to find safety and security in jail. Often the knee jerk reaction is to make the jails harder. In response, I am reminded of novelist Fyodor Dostoyevsky, "A society should be judged not by how it treats its outstanding citizens but by how it treats its criminals."
Many of the recidivists have spent more time in jail than they have in the community. There is no plan for reentry into the community, once an individual serves his jail sentence. Not surprisingly, local jails have reported rates of recidivism as high as 75%. This is after many of the inmates have received services while they were incarcerated. It is only logical to expect that when an arrestee is released without services or a plan in the place, the likelihood of that individual being arrested is greater than those who have received services while in jail.
The criminal justice community is aware of risk factors associated with being rearrested. The legislature needs to consider these factors and provide judicial discretion for those situations. At the same time, there is a presumption of innocence for those who are arrested. If New York state wants to get serious about criminal justice reform, they need to address reentry, and build healthy communities that will provide the same services that are currently present in jail. But there needs to be a plan.
Robert Goldman is a licensed psychologist and attorney. He spent 14 years working for Suffolk County as a Supervising Psychologist for Probation, County Mental Hygiene Services and Riverhead and Yaphank Jails.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 2When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
- 3New York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
- 4'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
- 5About the Awards: Southeastern Legal Awards Q&A with Regional Managing Editor Michael Marciano
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250