1st Department Confirms Harvey Weinstein's Trial Will Continue on Schedule in Manhattan
The former movie producer's lawyers are expected to argue that his interactions with the women were consensual and, in at least some cases, transactional.
January 21, 2020 at 06:21 PM
4 minute read
Opening statements in the criminal trial of former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein are expected to begin Wednesday in Manhattan Criminal Court, despite attempts from Weinstein's lawyers to move or delay the trial.
The judges in New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department rejected the defense team's motions for a change of venue and a stay Tuesday in a single-sentence order, echoing their refusal last fall to move the trial outside Manhattan.
News about Weinstein has traveled around the world, prosecutors in the Manhattan District Attorney's Office had argued, so moving the trial to another county in New York was unlikely to make a big difference to the case.
Weinstein is charged with rape, criminal sexual act and predatory sexual assault, which in New York is defined as rape or a related act against multiple people or, alternatively, rape or a related crime involving a weapon or causing injury. He has pleaded not guilty.
The former movie producer's lawyers are expected to argue that his interactions with the women were consensual and, in at least some cases, transactional.
"Who here thinks that someone could have consensual sexual relations with someone at work to get ahead at work?" Arthur Aidala of Aidala Bertuna & Kamins asked potential jurors.
Another member of Weinstein's defense team, Damon Cheronis, asked jurors if someone "could have sex with someone that they may not find attractive for reasons other than love."
Starting in fall 2017, when The New Yorker magazine and the The New York Times each published investigations into Weinstein's interactions with women during his decades in the movie business, more than 100 women have reportedly accused the former producer of sexual harassment and sexual assault. Many said he threatened to derail their careers if they did not cooperate with his advances.
Despite the dozens of accusations, Weinstein has been criminally charged in New York and Los Angeles in just a handful of the cases.
After more than a week of juror prescreening, a jury of 12 Manhattan residents, consisting of seven men and five women, and three alternates were seated in just a day and a half. Judge James Burke told potential jurors that awareness of Weinstein's story would not disqualify them, but they would need to consider only the evidence they heard inside the courtroom.
Dozens of potential jurors were dismissed after saying they could not be objective in the case. Weinstein's lawyers repeatedly objected to the fact that the jurors saw a wall of news cameras both in the hallway outside the courtroom and around the courthouse doors, waiting to film every step Weinstein took outside the courtroom.
Burke dismissed the idea that the media had created a carnival-like atmosphere, saying at one point that reporters have been careful to follow the rules of the court.
The judge also appeared resigned to the fact that the trial has attracted protests. When noise from one street protest reached the 15th-floor courtroom, Burke noted that it was unlikely to be the last time.
Read more:
7 Men, 5 Women Will Sit as Jury in Harvey Weinstein's New York Rape Trial
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute readJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
Trending Stories
- 1NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
- 2Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 3Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 4K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 5'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250