Avenatti's Special Housing Status 'For His Own Protection,' MCC Warden Says in Allowing Access to Legal Resources Ahead of Trial
U.S. District Judge Paul G. Gardephe has been asked to "inquire into" custody status of the embattled attorney and direct the federal Bureau of Prisons to consider Avenatti's "immediate removal to general population."
January 21, 2020 at 12:26 PM
5 minute read
The warden of Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Facility said Tuesday afternoon that Michael Avenatti was being held in a special housing unit "for his own safety," as he waits to stand trial next week on charges that the tried to extort Nike Inc.
The explanation, from warden M. Licon-Vitale, came just hours after the Manhattan federal judge overseeing Avenatti's criminal case ordered prosecutors to respond to concerns from the embattled lawyer's defense team about his living conditions in the jail, where he has been held since a California judge revoked his bail last week.
Criminal defense attorney Scott Srebnick had complained that restrictive conditions at MCC made it difficult for Avenatti to prepare his defense for trial, which is scheduled to start by Jan. 27 in the Southern District of New York.
According to Srebnick, Avenatti had been placed in solitary confinement and was under 24-hour watch in the same cell that once housed Mexican drug lord Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman. Avenatti's visits with attorneys happened behind a partition that did not allow him to freely review documents, and he had no access over the weekend to a computer to review discovery materials, Srebnick said.
"Under Mr. Avenatti's current conditions of confinement, we cannot effectively prepare for trial and Mr. Avenatti cannot meaningfully assist in his defense," Srebnick wrote in a letter to U.S. District Judge Paul G. Gardephe of the Southern District of New York.
"Our principle ask is that Mr. Avenatti be moved to general population, where he has the same ability to confer with counsel as other pretrial detainees," he said.
Licon-Vitale confirmed Tuesday that Avenatti arrived at the jail after normal business hours on Friday and that his "notoriety" warranted the kind of "special administrative measures" that are typical for inmates housed in MCC's 10-South wing.
Moving forward, Licon-Vitale said, Avenatti would be allowed to keep legal documents in his cell and could review discovery materials on a computer "at his request." He would also be allowed to select a regular time to visit with his family and attorneys.
"Should Mr. Avenatti have further concerns with his conditions at MCC New York, his defense counsel can feel free to reach out to me," Licon-Vitale said.
A federal judge in California last week ordered Avenatti to be detained after he was found to have violated the terms of his release. The development, Gardephe said in a conference call, had thrown the New York case into a state of "chaos" on the eve of trial in the Nike extortion case, which had been scheduled to start Tuesday.
Trial in the case has been delayed, while prosecutors and defense counsel continue to brief a series of pretrial motions. The parties were scheduled to meet for a pretrial conference Wednesday morning in Manhattan.
Defense counsel have also said that Avenatti's pretrial detention threatened his ability to pay for for his defense, and they raised last week the possibility of starting indigency proceedings, if no funds were available.
Avenatti is charged in New York with extortion, conspiracy and honest services wire fraud related to his representation of Gary Franklin, a California-based youth basketball coach who claimed to have damaging information about alleged payments Nike made to the families of college basketball recruits.
According to the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, Avenatti told Nike he would keep the alleged recruiting violations quiet, so long as the company agreed to settle his client's claims and pay Avenatti between $15 million and $25 million to head an internal investigation. Crucially, prosecutors said that Avenatti never told Franklin about Nike's offers to resolve the dispute without paying Avenatti or retaining him for an internal probe.
He also has been charged in a sprawling indictment in California with embezzling hundreds of thousands of dollars from former clients. A separate case in Manhattan also accused him of skimming money from a book deal that was being paid to his former client, adult film star Stormy Daniels, who accused President Donald Trump of engaging in an extramarital affair. Trump has categorically denied the allegation.
Avenatti has pleaded not guilty in all three cases and vigorously maintains his innocence.
Prosecutors in the Southern District of California on Jan. 15 laid out a series of fresh financial crimes they said he committed last year while awaiting trial in that district. He was arrested Jan. 14 while attending a professional disciplinary hearing at a Los Angeles courthouse and transferred to MCC on Jan. 17.
Read More:
Avenatti's Extortion Trial Delayed Following Arrest in California
Michael Avenatti, 1 Week Before NY Trial, Is Arrested for Bail Violations in LA
Judge Denies Michael Avenatti's Motion to Dismiss Third Count of Nike Extortion Indictment
Avenatti Seeks to Exclude Evidence of Personal Finances From Nike Extortion Trial
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
- 2Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 3Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 4K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 5'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250