Parnas' Attorney Calls on AG William Barr to Recuse From Ongoing Investigation, Prosecution
Attorney Joseph Bondy said Monday that Barr's proximity to the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump prevented him from impartially overseeing Parnas' prosecution
January 21, 2020 at 01:49 PM
4 minute read
Lev Parnas, the indicted ex-associate of Rudy Giuliani charged with federal campaign finance violations in New York, has asked U.S. Attorney General William Barr to recuse himself from the ongoing investigation and prosecution, alleging he has a conflict of interest.
In a letter to Barr, Parnas' attorney Joseph Bondy said Monday that Barr's proximity to the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump prevented him from impartially overseeing Parnas' prosecution, and asked for the appointment of a special prosecutor from outside the Department of Justice.
"Federal ethics guidelines bar federal employees from participating in matters in which their impartiality could be questioned, including matters in which they were personally involved or about which they have personal knowledge," Bondy wrote in the three-page missive.
A spokeswoman for the DOJ declined to comment Tuesday.
The public record, Bondy said, was "replete" with calls for Barr to step aside in light of allegations linking the attorney general to a scheme to pressure Ukraine's president into announcing an investigation of Trump's political rival, Joe Biden.
Parnas himself has claimed to have carried out the pressure campaign at the direction of Giuliani, Trump's personal attorney, and last week directly implicated Trump, Barr and Vice President Mike Pence in the alleged scheme.
All three officials have denied allegations of personal involvement.
But Bondy's letter cited references from a whistleblower complaint and a transcript of Trump's July 25 call with his Ukrainian counterpart, in which the president named Barr as the "point person" for those efforts. He also noted public calls from the New York City Bar Association and Democrats on the Senate Judiciary urging Barr to recuse himself from ongoing probes related to the Ukraine scandal.
The conflicts, he said, had also affected Parnas' criminal case in New York, where Bondy has complained that discovery delays have prevented his client from complying with a congressional subpoena that could allow him to be called as a witness at Trump's impeachment trial.
The city bar, which has expressed similar concerns about Barr's involvement, declined to comment Tuesday.
In an interview last week, Bondy told the New York Law Journal that prosecutors in the Southern District of New York had refused Parnas' requests to provide information that could be helpful to the probe and said he plans to use Parnas' potential cooperation with impeachment investigators in part to mitigate any sentence he might receive if convicted in the criminal case.
"Given the totality of the circumstances, we believe it is appropriate for you to recuse yourself from the ongoing investigation and pending prosecution of Mr. Parnas, and to allow the then-acting attorney general to appoint a special prosecutor from outside the Department of Justice, so as to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest and to preserve public trust in the rule of law," Bondy wrote.
Parnas has pleaded not guilty in New York to four counts of conspiracy, falsifying records and making false statements to the Federal Election Commission. A federal indictment in October accused Parnas and his associates of funneling foreign money into U.S. elections in order to buy political influence.
Read More:
Meet Joseph Bondy, Lev Parnas' Attorney and Cannabis Law Expert
Giuliani-Linked Defendant Parnas to Remain Free on Bail as Judge Rejects Prosecutors' Bid to Revoke
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
- 2Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
- 3Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 4Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
- 5A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250