Parnas' Attorney Calls on AG William Barr to Recuse From Ongoing Investigation, Prosecution
Attorney Joseph Bondy said Monday that Barr's proximity to the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump prevented him from impartially overseeing Parnas' prosecution
January 21, 2020 at 01:49 PM
4 minute read
Lev Parnas, the indicted ex-associate of Rudy Giuliani charged with federal campaign finance violations in New York, has asked U.S. Attorney General William Barr to recuse himself from the ongoing investigation and prosecution, alleging he has a conflict of interest.
In a letter to Barr, Parnas' attorney Joseph Bondy said Monday that Barr's proximity to the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump prevented him from impartially overseeing Parnas' prosecution, and asked for the appointment of a special prosecutor from outside the Department of Justice.
"Federal ethics guidelines bar federal employees from participating in matters in which their impartiality could be questioned, including matters in which they were personally involved or about which they have personal knowledge," Bondy wrote in the three-page missive.
A spokeswoman for the DOJ declined to comment Tuesday.
The public record, Bondy said, was "replete" with calls for Barr to step aside in light of allegations linking the attorney general to a scheme to pressure Ukraine's president into announcing an investigation of Trump's political rival, Joe Biden.
Parnas himself has claimed to have carried out the pressure campaign at the direction of Giuliani, Trump's personal attorney, and last week directly implicated Trump, Barr and Vice President Mike Pence in the alleged scheme.
All three officials have denied allegations of personal involvement.
But Bondy's letter cited references from a whistleblower complaint and a transcript of Trump's July 25 call with his Ukrainian counterpart, in which the president named Barr as the "point person" for those efforts. He also noted public calls from the New York City Bar Association and Democrats on the Senate Judiciary urging Barr to recuse himself from ongoing probes related to the Ukraine scandal.
The conflicts, he said, had also affected Parnas' criminal case in New York, where Bondy has complained that discovery delays have prevented his client from complying with a congressional subpoena that could allow him to be called as a witness at Trump's impeachment trial.
The city bar, which has expressed similar concerns about Barr's involvement, declined to comment Tuesday.
In an interview last week, Bondy told the New York Law Journal that prosecutors in the Southern District of New York had refused Parnas' requests to provide information that could be helpful to the probe and said he plans to use Parnas' potential cooperation with impeachment investigators in part to mitigate any sentence he might receive if convicted in the criminal case.
"Given the totality of the circumstances, we believe it is appropriate for you to recuse yourself from the ongoing investigation and pending prosecution of Mr. Parnas, and to allow the then-acting attorney general to appoint a special prosecutor from outside the Department of Justice, so as to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest and to preserve public trust in the rule of law," Bondy wrote.
Parnas has pleaded not guilty in New York to four counts of conspiracy, falsifying records and making false statements to the Federal Election Commission. A federal indictment in October accused Parnas and his associates of funneling foreign money into U.S. elections in order to buy political influence.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250