Prosecutors Stress Youth, Naivete of Alleged Victims; Harvey Weinstein's Lawyers Question Their Stories
Weinstein put the alleged victims through a series of tests, prosecutors said in opening statements, ensuring that they could be manipulated and that they would stay quiet about his behavior.
January 22, 2020 at 12:21 PM
7 minute read
While lawyers on opposite sides presented radically divergent views of Harvey Weinstein during opening statements in his rape trial in Manhattan Criminal Court on Wednesday, both the prosecution and defense teams made it clear that he is no ordinary defendant.
The attorneys also tangled over how to refer to the former movie producer, and the defense team told jurors they would present evidence that accusers' stories had changed.
Meghan Hast of the Manhattan District Attorney's Office showed jurors photos of Weinstein on a red carpet and with his arm around former President Bill Clinton, emphasizing the influence and power he held over his alleged victims.
The Clinton photo was one basis for defense lawyers' failed motion for a mistrial at the end of the day, when Arthur Aidala of Aidala Bertuna & Kamins argued that the circumstances around Clinton's impeachment, including his sexual interaction with a much younger woman, would be at the top of jurors' minds because of the ongoing impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.
"The jury isn't allowed to read about (the Weinstein) case in the news, but they can read about impeachment," Aidala said, asking why prosecutors didn't discuss Weinstein's connections to other major celebrities and political figures, including former President Barack Obama and the Cuomo family.
During his own opening statement, defense attorney Damon Cheronis also described Weinstein's fame, mentioning some of his top movie hits and talking openly about the heavy news coverage of Weinstein in the fall of 2017, when The New Yorker magazine and The New York Times published investigations into his alleged sexual harassment and assault of women across several decades.
Cheronis told the jurors they would hear evidence that the alleged victims in this case changed their stories once the other allegations came out.
"The truth has changed, and the truth can't change," he said. "There is only one truth."
Weinstein's defense lawyers also objected to prosecutors' discussion of Weinstein's height and weight. Prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon said that because Weinstein appeared frail in court, she had to make sure jurors knew that he was physically imposing during the dates of the alleged attacks.
"If somebody is charged with predatory sexual assault and we call them a predator, that's like somebody being charged with robbery and we call them a robber," Illuzzi-Orbon said.
Hast began her opening statement before a packed courtroom that included Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. Dozens more people, including reporters and members of the public, waited in line outside after the courtroom filled up.
Weinstein has pleaded not guilty to predatory sexual assault, rape and criminal sexual act in connection with alleged attacks against three women over a 20-year period.
In her opening statement, Hast said that even though Weinstein aged into his 60s during the time period in question, his victims remained in their 20s and were typically aspiring actresses without much family support or experience in the industry.
Hast shared details about six women's stories, emphasizing the similarities and patterns in Weinstein's behavior. He put his victims through a series of tests, Hast said, ensuring that they could be manipulated and that they would stay quiet about his behavior.
She urged jurors—seven men and five women—to consider scientific evidence about typical behavior for rape victims, saying that it's very common for women to know their attackers, to freeze up or refrain from physical resistance for safety reasons, and even to reach out to attackers after the incident.
Weinstein himself often reached out to women after attacking them, Hast said, trying to ensure he would maintain his influence and keep them quiet. The ex-movie mogul could switch on a dime between professional, charming behavior and shocking aggression, she told jurors.
"It will be clear throughout this trial that the defendant knew he was preying on the naive and inexperienced," Hast said. "These were not mutual adult relationships. These young women were pawns being pushed around by the defendant."
In one example, Weinstein asked a young woman for a massage in his hotel room, where she had come for a professional meeting, Hast said. The woman refused and left, upset, but she was surprised when a Weinstein staff member followed up to offer her a job on the TV series "Project Runway."
The woman sent Weinstein a thank you note about the job, and they had a peaceful, professional meeting over drinks that made her wonder whether the massage request had been an aberration, Hast said.
But she had told the producer that she was worried about her immigration status and some other personal details, and Hast said sharing those vulnerabilities only increased the chances that Weinstein would target her.
Believing she'd been clear about her lack of romantic or sexual interest in Weinstein, the woman then agreed to meet him at his apartment, Hast said.
In graphic detail, Hast told jurors how Weinstein backed the woman into a bedroom, ignored her protests, yanked out her tampon and performed oral sex on her without her consent.
Weinstein, who walked into court physically supported by two members of his team and without his walker for the first time Wednesday, appeared to listen actively during Hast's statement. He leaned over to speak to his lawyers and occasionally showed his disbelief, laughing when Hast told the jurors that he is "not a harmless old man."
To start his own opening statement, which was interrupted by the court's lunch break, Weinstein defense attorney Cheronis showed jurors detailed timelines and messages between the women and Weinstein.
The messages showed that some of the women continued to address Weinstein in a friendly way and even ask him for favors after the alleged assaults, Cheronis said. Hast had argued that the women were trying to stay in Weinstein's professional good graces while keeping their distance, but Cheronis said not all the messages reflected that.
Cheronis urged jurors to consider the other side of the much-discussed power dynamic, which Hast had said put Weinstein in a position of power over the women.
"Can you envision a situation where someone like Harvey Weinstein, who does have power, people want things from him?" Cheronis asked.
READ MORE:
1st Department Confirms Harvey Weinstein's Trial Will Continue on Schedule in Manhattan
Lawyers for Harvey Weinstein Call for NY Judge's Recusal in Criminal Trial
7 Men, 5 Women Will Sit as Jury in Harvey Weinstein's New York Rape Trial
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWalt Disney, IBM Denied High Court Review of Old NY Franchise Tax Law
3 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Just Ahead of Oral Argument, Fubo Settles Antitrust Case with Disney, Fox, Warner Bros.
Trending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250