The Future Is Now
Laurel R. Kretzing, Chair of the NYSBA Commercial and Federal Litigation Section, writes about how the section is looking to the future, a theme that is carried forward in its Annual Meeting programs, which focus on developing litigation technologies and new and emerging issues that litigators must be prepared to address.
January 24, 2020 at 01:06 PM
3 minute read
The Commercial and Federal Litigation Section is looking to the future, a theme that is carried forward in this year's Annual Meeting CLE programs, which focus on developing litigation technologies and new and emerging issues that litigators must be prepared to address.
This year the section created a Young Lawyers Committee of the section, established for young commercial litigators, admitted 10 years or less, to provide a forum to provide support and programming of interest to lawyers starting out in the demanding world of commercial litigation and to provide a springboard for section leadership of the future.
In keeping with this forward-looking focus, the first program of the Annual Meeting is entitled "Emerging Technologies in Litigation." A panel moderated by Kan M. Nowaday of Venable will discuss both new technologies for litigators to use, including developments in AI technology to predict court decisions, blockchain and e-discovery and predictive coding, as well as new litigations issues created by emerging technologies. The panel will consist of Hon. Melissa A. Crane, New York Supreme Court; Maura R. Grossman, J.D., Ph.D., School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo; Gail L. Gottehrer, Law Offices of Gail Gottehrer; and the Hon. Katherine B. Forrest (ret.), Cravath Swain & Moore.
The second program is focused on the commercial litigation aspects of the move among the states toward legalization of cannabis and cannabis-based products and the issues that lawyers with clients engaged in the cannabis and CBD business will face. The program is called "Budding Cannabis and CBD Litigation: Are You Ready for the Green Wave Heading Towards New York." The panel, moderated by Paul D. Sarkozi of Tannenbaum Halpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt, will explain the differences between cannabis and CBD from a legal, compliance and practical perspective and discuss emerging trends in litigation around the United States and the ethical and business challenges of handling matters involving state-sanctioned but federally illegal products. Panelists include James K. Landau, McCarthy Fingar; Elinor C. Sutton, Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; and Sara E. Payne, Jushi Holdings.
At the Gala Lunch the section will honor the Hon. John G. Koeltl, District Judge of the Southern District of New York with its Stanley H. Fuld Award, presented by Mary Jo White of Debevoise Plimpton. The Fuld Award was created by the section in honor of the late Chief Judge of the New York Court of Appeals. The section presents the award annually to recognize outstanding contributions to the development of commercial law and jurisprudence. Judge Koeltl, as a former member of the Civil Rules Advisory Committee and Chair of the Subcommittee that focused on active judicial case management and the long-ignored principal of proportionality in discovery, preparing the bench and bar to deal with ever emerging technology issues impacting discovery, is a very well deserving recipient of the Fuld Award.
Laurel R. Kretzing is the Chief of the Litigation and Appeals Bureau in the Office of the Nassau County Attorney, where she oversees civil litigation for the County of Nassau.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250