Mid-Market Cross-Selling and Servicing: A Proactive Education Program Is Key
A variety of manageable inter-departmental educational opportunities and partner/management committee-level support are the primary elements you will need to form and grow your program.
January 27, 2020 at 11:00 AM
6 minute read
"Does anyone know an attorney who handles …?" — Lawyers Everywhere
We all have sent or received this email at one time or another at our firms. Perhaps it's your neighbor, a tech executive, fighting for a patent, or a colleague from another firm looking for local counsel to handle a complex zoning issue. We scan our mental Rolodex and, not coming up with a familiar name, we cast a net for referrals to help our friend. However, that knowledge and experience often exist right in your mid-sized firm but some of your attorneys don't know it. You can fix that.
The Challenge to Cross-Selling
The most significant obstacle to developing a strong cross-selling program is a lack of inter-departmental awareness and education. Or more precisely, a lack of time devoted to awareness and education. This reality is often the product of busy law firms. Many of us are focused on our own matters and are hard pressed to find the time to get to know other departments. While on the surface that may not seem like the worst thing—busy attorneys focused on their clients—the long-term consequence is that their clients are not getting to know the whole firm. As the adage goes, we lose the forest for the trees. This results in missed opportunities to bring increased value to your clients, credence to your internal referral program and growth to your associates and counsel in developing their books of business.
Turning Obstacles Into Opportunities
Education, education, education. Intra-department education provides attorneys with the basic knowledge necessary to identify client needs in complex areas. By expanding the areas in which a client is serviced, you begin to develop true internal collaboration. A client team can now assess a client's business more holistically and provide counsel that considers more than the immediate legal issue at hand.
Moreover, when attorneys know the firm's abilities, they can add value for their clients by helping them centralize their work with one law firm as a partner in business, simplifying their lives. Further, attorneys can bolster their professional network standing by becoming a more well-versed resource, which can lead to enhanced relationships and additional business.
These are just a few reasons that attorneys should invest the time necessary to get to know the firm's base of experience, but they will need a manageable and reliable firm-managed education program.
The Way Forward
Developing practical and sustainable methods of inter-departmental education is central to a successful internal referral program. Offer a variety of settings for your attorneys to get to know each other and their respective practices that reflect how your people like to engage. Monthly luncheons "hosted" by a practice group who can speak to hot topics in their area is a tried and true approach to secure a focused audience. Internal CLEs with a meaningful Q&A portion at the end is a highly effective manner of advancing inter-department knowledge. A monthly pipeline meeting, where attorneys come together in a structured way to discuss potential opportunities for new business, allows attorneys to identify clients their group is looking for and provides them a platform to highlight successes that can encourage collaboration across departments. Regular pipeline meetings pay an additional dividend by facilitating and reinforcing mutual education of their respective practices.
With a foundation of understanding and inter-departmental knowledge established, introduce regular small group dinners with up to eight attorneys across departments to deepen one-on-one relationships throughout the firm. This type of intimate and unstructured atmosphere allows for more nuanced conversations on their respective practices and client base. Further, a more relaxed setting provides the attendees a way to genuinely get to know each other outside the formality of the office.
Encourage your management team to attend these events as well. Management can often identify inter-department service needs early on and help guide connections between departments. Further, they can implement more passive ways of sharing experience and information throughout the firm, such as detailed conflict digests that provide short narratives from new matter forms submitted by the attorneys. These narratives should speak to the type of matter and how they seek to help the client, e.g., defense of code enforcement proceedings involving outdoor signage. Also, internal newsletters or a dedicated section of an intranet are useful ways of sharing client success stories in a transparent and real-time manner.
Overcoming Resistance
It is no secret how protective we are conditioned to be over our clients. After all, we have poured years into developing our client relationships. It is perfectly reasonable to be hesitant about letting an unknown quantity into our client universe. Nevertheless, pushing past these anxieties to bring added value to your client is critical. As in any strong relationship, the first step is to let your guard down a bit. Spending time with a smaller group of your colleagues and talking about their wins and losses, how they have navigated sophisticated legal issues, and sharing your own, will help establish the first building blocks of a trusting referral relationship.
Collaborating on a group pitch is another approach to learning and sharing the nuances of your practices, client-service philosophies and billing strategies to help build trusting relationships. A member of the management team, such as the CFO or Director of Marketing/Business Development can serve as a team leader in preparing pitches or responses to RFPs and can work to identify key areas of expertise in the firm and bring those people together.
Share the Win
Few things can go such a long way in improving firm culture and morale as sharing a win. Implement ways to celebrate and highlight successful pitches or new business that recognize all the players on the team. From the administrative person typing up the pitch materials to the attorneys who shared their experience and contacts, reveal to the firm the process in which a client team came together to assemble a winning pitch. This can take the form of an email, a periodic firm newsletter, or a shoutout during a firm event.
Even if a strong pitch or RFP response does not result in the targeted business, the collaborative process helps to limit silos, educate attorneys on the firm's collective experience, and develop a healthy reciprocal referral program.
The Takeaway
Developing a strong cross-selling and servicing program requires a commitment to shifting the firm's culture from reactive to proactive. A variety of manageable inter-departmental educational opportunities and partner/management committee-level support are the primary elements you will need to form and grow your program.
Alan Tarter is the managing partner of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin, a full-service law firm. Tanya Duprey is the firm administrator and past president of the New York City Chapter of the Association of Legal Administrators. For more information about the firm, please visit www.tarterkrinsky.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllReflections on the Changing Legal Profession Upon 40 Years in Practice
'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTopping Big Law, Litigation Firm the Latest to Dole Out Above-Market Bonuses
3 minute readAttorneys 'On the Move': McGuireWoods Hires Digital Healthcare Lawyer; Duane Morris Adds Corporate Partner
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
- 24th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
- 3Lawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
- 4Fellows LaBriola LLP is Pleased to Announce that Alisha Goel Has Become Associated with The Firm
- 5Law Firms Turn to 'Golden Handcuffs' to Rein In Partner Movement
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250