Mid-Market Cross-Selling and Servicing: A Proactive Education Program Is Key
A variety of manageable inter-departmental educational opportunities and partner/management committee-level support are the primary elements you will need to form and grow your program.
January 27, 2020 at 11:00 AM
6 minute read
"Does anyone know an attorney who handles …?" — Lawyers Everywhere
We all have sent or received this email at one time or another at our firms. Perhaps it's your neighbor, a tech executive, fighting for a patent, or a colleague from another firm looking for local counsel to handle a complex zoning issue. We scan our mental Rolodex and, not coming up with a familiar name, we cast a net for referrals to help our friend. However, that knowledge and experience often exist right in your mid-sized firm but some of your attorneys don't know it. You can fix that.
|The Challenge to Cross-Selling
The most significant obstacle to developing a strong cross-selling program is a lack of inter-departmental awareness and education. Or more precisely, a lack of time devoted to awareness and education. This reality is often the product of busy law firms. Many of us are focused on our own matters and are hard pressed to find the time to get to know other departments. While on the surface that may not seem like the worst thing—busy attorneys focused on their clients—the long-term consequence is that their clients are not getting to know the whole firm. As the adage goes, we lose the forest for the trees. This results in missed opportunities to bring increased value to your clients, credence to your internal referral program and growth to your associates and counsel in developing their books of business.
|Turning Obstacles Into Opportunities
Education, education, education. Intra-department education provides attorneys with the basic knowledge necessary to identify client needs in complex areas. By expanding the areas in which a client is serviced, you begin to develop true internal collaboration. A client team can now assess a client's business more holistically and provide counsel that considers more than the immediate legal issue at hand.
Moreover, when attorneys know the firm's abilities, they can add value for their clients by helping them centralize their work with one law firm as a partner in business, simplifying their lives. Further, attorneys can bolster their professional network standing by becoming a more well-versed resource, which can lead to enhanced relationships and additional business.
These are just a few reasons that attorneys should invest the time necessary to get to know the firm's base of experience, but they will need a manageable and reliable firm-managed education program.
|The Way Forward
Developing practical and sustainable methods of inter-departmental education is central to a successful internal referral program. Offer a variety of settings for your attorneys to get to know each other and their respective practices that reflect how your people like to engage. Monthly luncheons "hosted" by a practice group who can speak to hot topics in their area is a tried and true approach to secure a focused audience. Internal CLEs with a meaningful Q&A portion at the end is a highly effective manner of advancing inter-department knowledge. A monthly pipeline meeting, where attorneys come together in a structured way to discuss potential opportunities for new business, allows attorneys to identify clients their group is looking for and provides them a platform to highlight successes that can encourage collaboration across departments. Regular pipeline meetings pay an additional dividend by facilitating and reinforcing mutual education of their respective practices.
With a foundation of understanding and inter-departmental knowledge established, introduce regular small group dinners with up to eight attorneys across departments to deepen one-on-one relationships throughout the firm. This type of intimate and unstructured atmosphere allows for more nuanced conversations on their respective practices and client base. Further, a more relaxed setting provides the attendees a way to genuinely get to know each other outside the formality of the office.
Encourage your management team to attend these events as well. Management can often identify inter-department service needs early on and help guide connections between departments. Further, they can implement more passive ways of sharing experience and information throughout the firm, such as detailed conflict digests that provide short narratives from new matter forms submitted by the attorneys. These narratives should speak to the type of matter and how they seek to help the client, e.g., defense of code enforcement proceedings involving outdoor signage. Also, internal newsletters or a dedicated section of an intranet are useful ways of sharing client success stories in a transparent and real-time manner.
|Overcoming Resistance
It is no secret how protective we are conditioned to be over our clients. After all, we have poured years into developing our client relationships. It is perfectly reasonable to be hesitant about letting an unknown quantity into our client universe. Nevertheless, pushing past these anxieties to bring added value to your client is critical. As in any strong relationship, the first step is to let your guard down a bit. Spending time with a smaller group of your colleagues and talking about their wins and losses, how they have navigated sophisticated legal issues, and sharing your own, will help establish the first building blocks of a trusting referral relationship.
Collaborating on a group pitch is another approach to learning and sharing the nuances of your practices, client-service philosophies and billing strategies to help build trusting relationships. A member of the management team, such as the CFO or Director of Marketing/Business Development can serve as a team leader in preparing pitches or responses to RFPs and can work to identify key areas of expertise in the firm and bring those people together.
|Share the Win
Few things can go such a long way in improving firm culture and morale as sharing a win. Implement ways to celebrate and highlight successful pitches or new business that recognize all the players on the team. From the administrative person typing up the pitch materials to the attorneys who shared their experience and contacts, reveal to the firm the process in which a client team came together to assemble a winning pitch. This can take the form of an email, a periodic firm newsletter, or a shoutout during a firm event.
Even if a strong pitch or RFP response does not result in the targeted business, the collaborative process helps to limit silos, educate attorneys on the firm's collective experience, and develop a healthy reciprocal referral program.
|The Takeaway
Developing a strong cross-selling and servicing program requires a commitment to shifting the firm's culture from reactive to proactive. A variety of manageable inter-departmental educational opportunities and partner/management committee-level support are the primary elements you will need to form and grow your program.
Alan Tarter is the managing partner of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin, a full-service law firm. Tanya Duprey is the firm administrator and past president of the New York City Chapter of the Association of Legal Administrators. For more information about the firm, please visit www.tarterkrinsky.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': McGuireWoods Hires Digital Healthcare Lawyer; Duane Morris Adds Corporate Partner
4 minute read200 Hrs. of Partner Prep Guides Quinn Emanuel's Incredibly Detailed Mock Bankruptcy Trial
Attorneys 'On the Move': Greenspoon Marder Boosts Litigation Practice; Former Federal Prosecutor Joins Baker Botts
4 minute readFor Summer Associates, Experience in 'Real Matters' Trumps Recreational Perks
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250