NY AG James, FTC Seek Lifetime Ban for 'Pharma Bro' Martin Shkreli for 'Monopolizing' Drug
In her lawsuit, James said that Daraprim, which is also used to treat HIV, had been "cheap and accessible" for decades, until Turing purchased the drug and then dramatically raised its price overnight
January 27, 2020 at 05:49 PM
3 minute read
The Federal Trade Commission and New York Attorney General Letitia James on Monday sued disgraced pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli and his former company for "illegally monopolizing" the market for a drug used to treat potentially fatal parasitic infections.
The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court, accused Shkreli and Vyera Pharmaceuticals of blocking generic competition for the drug, Daraprim, so that the company could later raise its price by more than 4,000%—to $750 per pill— in August 2015.
The suit seeks the return of millions of dollars in illegally obtained profits, as well as an order permanently barring Shkreli and his former business partner, Kevin Mulleady, from ever working in the pharmaceutical industry ever again.
"Martin Shkreli and Vyera not only enriched themselves by despicably jacking up the price of this life-saving medication by 4,000 percent in a single day, but held this critical drug hostage from patients and competitors as they illegally sought to maintain their monopoly," James said in a prepared statement.
Shkreli is serving a seven-year prison sentence after a federal appeals court last year upheld his conviction on unrelated charges that he defrauded investors in two of his hedge funds.
But it was Shkreli's work as CEO of Vyera which first propelled the young executive to notoriety and earned him the moniker of "Pharma Bro" and, briefly, the "most hated man in America."
In her lawsuit, James said that Daraprim, which is also used to treat HIV, had been "cheap and accessible" for decades, until Turing purchased the drug and then dramatically raised its price overnight. According to the complaint, the firm laid the groundwork for the price spike by restricting the distribution of its own drug and blocking generic competitors from accessing a key ingredient.
Hospitals, physicians and patients, James said, were still feeling the effects of the alleged anti-competitive scheme in the form of "exorbitant prices" and difficult treatment decisions.
"We won't allow 'Pharma Bros' to manipulate the market and line their pockets at the expense of vulnerable patients and the health care system," James said.
Vyera's press shop did not immediately respond to an email Monday afternoon seeking comment on the lawsuit.
An online docket-tracking service did not immediately list representation for Shkreli.
The AG's office said that it began investigating Vyera shortly after Daraprim's price soared in 2015 and later shared its findings with the FTC, culminating in the filing of Monday's lawsuit. The FTC voted 5-0 to authorize the filing of the complaint, the commission said in a statement.
"Daraprim is a lifesaving drug for vulnerable patients," said Gail Levine, deputy director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition. "Vyera kept the price of Daraprim astronomically high by illegally boxing out the competition."
The case, captioned FTC v. Vyera, has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Denise L. Cote of the Southern District of New York.
Read More:
US Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Appeal from 'Pharma Bro' Martin Shkreli in Securities Fraud Case
Second Circuit Upholds 'Pharma Bro' Martin Shkreli's Fraud Conviction, $7.3M Asset Forfeiture
Jury Finds Former Martin Shkreli Attorney Guilty in Stock Scheme
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250