NY AG James, FTC Seek Lifetime Ban for 'Pharma Bro' Martin Shkreli for 'Monopolizing' Drug
In her lawsuit, James said that Daraprim, which is also used to treat HIV, had been "cheap and accessible" for decades, until Turing purchased the drug and then dramatically raised its price overnight
January 27, 2020 at 05:49 PM
3 minute read
The Federal Trade Commission and New York Attorney General Letitia James on Monday sued disgraced pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli and his former company for "illegally monopolizing" the market for a drug used to treat potentially fatal parasitic infections.
The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court, accused Shkreli and Vyera Pharmaceuticals of blocking generic competition for the drug, Daraprim, so that the company could later raise its price by more than 4,000%—to $750 per pill— in August 2015.
The suit seeks the return of millions of dollars in illegally obtained profits, as well as an order permanently barring Shkreli and his former business partner, Kevin Mulleady, from ever working in the pharmaceutical industry ever again.
"Martin Shkreli and Vyera not only enriched themselves by despicably jacking up the price of this life-saving medication by 4,000 percent in a single day, but held this critical drug hostage from patients and competitors as they illegally sought to maintain their monopoly," James said in a prepared statement.
Shkreli is serving a seven-year prison sentence after a federal appeals court last year upheld his conviction on unrelated charges that he defrauded investors in two of his hedge funds.
But it was Shkreli's work as CEO of Vyera which first propelled the young executive to notoriety and earned him the moniker of "Pharma Bro" and, briefly, the "most hated man in America."
In her lawsuit, James said that Daraprim, which is also used to treat HIV, had been "cheap and accessible" for decades, until Turing purchased the drug and then dramatically raised its price overnight. According to the complaint, the firm laid the groundwork for the price spike by restricting the distribution of its own drug and blocking generic competitors from accessing a key ingredient.
Hospitals, physicians and patients, James said, were still feeling the effects of the alleged anti-competitive scheme in the form of "exorbitant prices" and difficult treatment decisions.
"We won't allow 'Pharma Bros' to manipulate the market and line their pockets at the expense of vulnerable patients and the health care system," James said.
Vyera's press shop did not immediately respond to an email Monday afternoon seeking comment on the lawsuit.
An online docket-tracking service did not immediately list representation for Shkreli.
The AG's office said that it began investigating Vyera shortly after Daraprim's price soared in 2015 and later shared its findings with the FTC, culminating in the filing of Monday's lawsuit. The FTC voted 5-0 to authorize the filing of the complaint, the commission said in a statement.
"Daraprim is a lifesaving drug for vulnerable patients," said Gail Levine, deputy director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition. "Vyera kept the price of Daraprim astronomically high by illegally boxing out the competition."
The case, captioned FTC v. Vyera, has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Denise L. Cote of the Southern District of New York.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250