Energy Policy Transparency Group Aims to Unseal Documents in Exxon Climate Change Case
The Hagens Berman lawyer is arguing that his communications with the Attorney General's Office are being targeted as part of a "national campaign against anyone seeking to hold Exxon liable for climate change."
January 28, 2020 at 04:28 PM
3 minute read
An energy policy transparency group—which its foes have linked to pro-coal interests—has filed a motion to intervene in the wake of a Manhattan trial that ended in a decisive verdict for Exxon Mobil, aiming to secure the release of documents associated with the New York Attorney General's Office action against the company over climate change.
But Boston attorney Matthew Pawa has asked to file an amicus brief to oppose the policy group's demand.
Pawa, of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, is arguing that his communications with the Attorney General's Office are being targeted as part of a "national campaign against anyone seeking to hold Exxon liable for climate change."
Then-New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood sued Exxon in October 2018, arguing that the company deceived its investors about the effects of climate change on its business and value.
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Barry Ostrager ruled in December that the Attorney General's Office failed to prove Exxon engaged in consistent fraud or violated New York's powerful Martin Act. The office did not appeal the decision, and the deadline for an appeal has passed.
Exxon's lead attorney, Theodore Wells of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, argued at trial that the Attorney General's Office was pursuing a political agenda on behalf of climate activists. Wells presented an agenda from a 2015 meeting at the Rockefeller Family Fund, saying that activists set out to influence state attorneys general and successfully targeted New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.
Months before the fall 2019 trial, Wells had accused the Attorney General's Office of "collusion with special interests to single out Irving, Texas-based ExxonMobil because of disagreements about climate policy," according to court filings.
Ostrager then allowed the Attorney General's Office to file emails between its lawyers and an outside attorney under seal. Exxon argued that the emails showed the outside lawyer's role in instigating the suit against the company, according to court filings.
The outside attorney was Pawa, according to the proposed amicus brief filed by Pawa's attorney, Wesley Kelman of Hagens Berman. Kelman argued that the Washington state nonprofit Energy Policy Advocates is seeking the release of Pawa's emails in part because, he said, the group has ties to pro-coal organizations.
According to its website, Energy Policy Advocates does not take policy positions but uses freedom of information laws to "bring transparency to the realm of energy and environmental policy."
On Tuesday, lawyers for the Energy Policy Advocates asked Ostrager for more time to respond to Pawa's filing.
Francis Menton, principal of the Francis Menton Law Firm in New York, who represents the energy nonprofit, said his client plans to file a reply to Pawa. He said the documents should be made public.
Paul Weiss did not respond to requests for comment, while Kelman and the New York Attorney General's Office declined to comment.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLukoil Pan Americas Sues Investment Firm Over Alleged $18 Million Breach
Judge Dismisses Solar Power Startup from Lawsuit Alleging Fraud By Ex-CEO
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250