Oct. Trial Set for Ex-Giuliani Associates Parnas and Fruman in Campaign-Finance Case
Asked whether he would assist the government's investigation, Lev Parnas said it was a "good question."
February 03, 2020 at 05:03 PM
5 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge on Monday set an Oct. 5 trial date in the case of Lev Parnas and another former associate of Rudy Giuliani charged with trying to illegally funnel foreign money into U.S. elections.
U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York blocked out three weeks for trial in the criminal campaign-finance case, which has loomed over the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.
Parnas and Igor Fruman, two foreign-born businessmen with ties to Giuliani, are accused along with two other men in a scheme prop up candidates for state and federal office in order to buy political influence in the U.S. All four defendants have pleaded not guilty and are currently free on bond.
Giuliani, a personal attorney to the president, is reported to be under investigation in the Southern District, though he has not been charged with any crimes.
Unlike his co-defendants, Parnas has mounted a public campaign to discuss his role in an alleged effort by members of the Trump administration to withhold aid to Ukraine in exchange for an announcement on investigations into Trump's political rival Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who sat on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma.
Parnas' attorney, Joseph Bondy, told the New York Law Journal last month that his client had hoped to be called as a witness in the Senate impeachment trial, partly, to mitigate any sentence he may receive in the Southern District. Last week, Bondy and Parnas traveled to Washington, D.C., to help bolster their case for testimony, but the Senate Republicans on Friday voted against calling witnesses ahead of an expected acquittal vote later this week.
Bondy alluded to the latest impeachment developments while addressing reporters and said he and his client would be ready to try the case in the fall.
"If we were to have a trial with no evidence and no witnesses and a jury of our friends, it would go a lot faster, but we're going to have a fair trial," Bondy said. "We're very much looking forward to having our days in court."
Prosecutors, meanwhile, updated Oetken on what they have described as "voluminous" discovery, which included more than 197,000 stamped documents, as well as approximately three terabytes worth of materials extracted from the defendants' phones, tablets and computers.
Assistant U.S. attorney Nicolas Roos also said the FBI is still trying to "crack" about 20 devices for which the defense has not provided passwords. The "vast majority" of discovery would be completed by mid-March, he said.
The Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office has left open the possibility of a superseding indictment in the case, but attorneys Monday declined to provide an update on their thinking. Roos said the office was still evaluating any decision and had discussed applicable deadlines with defense counsel.
"The government's aware of when it's appropriate to bring a superseder, based on those dates," he said.
Parnas has said that prosecutors have so far rebuffed his attempts to cooperate in the criminal case, and it wasn't immediately clear how the planned acquittal vote would impact his strategy moving forward.
Bondy did not immediately return a call requesting comment.
Asked Monday whether he would assist the government's investigation, Parnas said it was a "good question."
"I'm here to tell the truth," said Parnas, donning an American flag pin outside of the Lower Manhattan courthouse.
"We've been, the last month, as strong as possible, been able to help Senate and Congress and the world recognize the truth and what happened, and what is happening is and what's going on," he said. "I want to thank all the well wishers out there, all the supporters out there, it really keeps me going, and gives me strength to keep fighting against this powerful enemy but I think we will prevail."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250