Mid-Market Lateral Partner Recruiting: Practical Advice for Strategic Growth
Strategic lateral acquisitions can spur both organic growth and practice area expansion.
February 04, 2020 at 11:00 AM
6 minute read
A hungry stomach has no ears. – La Fontaine
The art of partner recruiting requires, above all, patience. While you may feel pressure to expand revenue streams, remember that high turnover is worse than slow growth. Developing a deliberate approach to recruiting that considers your firm's culture, client base, service gaps and economic structure will help avoid such an outcome.
|A Path to Growth
Strategic lateral acquisitions can spur both organic growth and practice area expansion. By diversifying your areas of practice, you bring greater value to your clients, develop new revenue sources and protect against the impacts of recession through practices countercyclical to your core areas when markets shift. Further, laterals engender opportunities to cross-sell and cross-service clients.
|Recruiting
Like most of our strongest relationships, we meet great people through the people we know. Therefore, look first to your trusted colleagues for referrals. Candidates from a referral pool tend to have the highest rates of success and as a bonus, no recruiter fee! However, lateral recruiting cannot depend on referrals alone.
Developing a strong relationship with the most effective recruiters will pay dividends for years to come. Educate them on your firm, keep them updated on the changing needs of your business, discuss changes to the economy and get their insights on the market. Most importantly, stay top of mind with them through tailored newsletters, periodic meetings or calls. Share successes with them and meaningful firm developments that candidates might find attractive.
|Interviews and Due Diligence
Although it is important to develop and maintain a consistent approach to interviewing and vetting candidates, keep in mind that each candidate will have unique circumstances and one candidate's journey will rarely mirror that of another's. Nevertheless, a few guiding principles can be helpful. First, keep the momentum going. If your process takes too long you risk fatiguing the candidate and can lose a viable opportunity to another suitor. Second, do not skip the lateral questionnaire. No matter how active a practice a candidate may have, a complete and thorough LPQ is a must. Third, listen to their story at every stage of their career and understand how noteworthy moments have impacted their current and future practice. Finally, your process should offer the candidate the most holistic view of the firm and what it has to offer them.
As part of the screening process, emphasis is often on the candidate's economic match with the firm. However, vetting should be equally focused on interpersonal compatibility with the practice group and synergies with other groups for cross-selling and service. One-on-one interviews remain the best way to facilitate substantive conversations on these points. While some gravitate towards the fishbowl approach, multiple attorneys conducting an interview simultaneously is rarely productive.
|Cue the Awkward Silence
Inevitably, during the interviewing process you will note some discrepancy or issue that requires a potentially uncomfortable conversation. This is often centered around finances, e.g., when you're really trying to verify and validate a candidate's book of business. Some candidates worry they may be sharing too much information while others may be masking deficits. Nonetheless, you must push through this line of questioning. Dedicate one meeting to finances with a stated agenda so they can prepare. Items to be discussed should include a draft business plan, several years of financials, and specific details as to any material changes in their book over the last year.
|Beware of Red Flags
Consider this as a standard disclaimer: Every candidate is different and red flags are simply things that should make you pause but none individually should necessarily be a deal-breaker. That being said, a few items that should make you sit up and take notice: emphasis on projections versus past performance; frequent movement; malpractice claims or disciplinary action; or rude, curt or other terse behavior. Finally, check your gut. The good old-fashioned gut check can get lost in a world conditioned to rationalize behavior, but developing a strong gut check is just as pertinent as any other interviewing technique.
|Onboarding—It's Personal
The true key to success in lateral recruiting is how well they integrate into your firm, which begins with the onboarding experience. A senior member of your management team should lead this stage of the lateral's journey. This can be your firm administrator, executive director or HR director—depending on how your firm is structured. Their objective is to ensure a seamless assimilation of the candidate into the firm.
Transitioning to a new firm can be one of the most challenging times in an attorney's career, so endeavor to make them feel seen, heard and valued through their transition. Assembling an onboarding team to meet with the lateral once they accept the offer is an effective way of covering all key areas affected by a transition. The onboarding team will work to understand the unique needs of the lateral's practice, learn about their clients, provide substantive guidance on conflicts, client consents, marketing communications and more. Right down to hanging their family photos, laterals ought to feel welcomed and cared for throughout this experience.
|Beyond the First Day
An often overlooked but vital step in a successful partner integration is checking in with your newest member periodically over the months that follow the transition. From client transfers to training to cross-selling meetings with other members of the firm, work to make sure that your new partner is becoming deeply embedded in the fabric of the firm. Additionally, be certain that the lateral fully assimilates into the practice group. Lastly, get feedback on their experience and share it with the transition team to improve your process for future recruiting efforts.
Alan Tarter is the managing partner of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin, a full-service law firm. Tanya Duprey is the firm administrator and past president of the New York City Chapter of the Association of Legal Administrators. For more information about the firm, please visit www.tarterkrinsky.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGet Your Popcorn Ready: Sanctions Regulations Involving Artwork and Media Content in a Post-'Chevron' World
11 minute readHow Businesses Can Protect Themselves Given the Influx Nature of Non-Competes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250