Upstate Judge Sets Aside NY Bail Reform Law as Unconstitutional in Misdemeanor Case
Judge Thomas Marcelle objected to the bail reform law on separation-of-powers grounds, writing that the state legislature should not have interfered with judges' ability to control how and when a defendant appears in court.
February 05, 2020 at 04:42 PM
3 minute read
A judge in Cohoes City Court in Albany County ruled Monday that New York's bail reform law, which has been effect for just over a month, is unconstitutional as applied to a misdemeanor case in which the defendant had a history of failing to appear.
Judge Thomas Marcelle objected to the bail reform law on separation-of-powers grounds, writing that the state legislature should not have interfered with judges' ability to control how and when a defendant appears in court.
"In short, a judge unable to make judgments is not a judge," he wrote.
Marcelle's decision ruled the new law was unconstitutional "as applied to this case." But the sweeping rationale may mean the decision will have influence beyond the case before the Cohoes judge.
The bail reform law, which was passed in April, was a subject of controversy even before it took effect Jan. 1. Calls for changes to the law have continued in recent weeks, with Gov. Andrew Cuomo acknowledging the law is a "work in progress."
Among other changes, the law ended money bail for misdemeanor cases, with limited exceptions for domestic violence and sex offense cases.
The defendant who appeared before Marcelle, Jonathan Johnston, has been charged with a pair of misdemeanors related to driving without a license.
Marcelle found that the bail reform law was motivated by the "quite real" concern that cash bail unfairly penalizes poor defendants, but he suggested legislators "impermissibly trespassed upon the judicial power" by categorically prohibiting bail in certain cases.
Johnston's attorney, Jessica Gorman, said the constitutionality of the bail reform law was not raised by either party but by Marcelle himself.
"That's improper," she said.
Among other issues, there was no discussion in court about whether Johnston's prior failures to appear were intentional, Gorman said. According to the bail reform law, judges may consider a defendant's "risk of flight" as they determine whether the defendant should be released with a promise to appear or with other non-monetary conditions.
Prosecutors did not take a position on Johnston's conditions for release, according to an Albany County District Attorney's Office spokeswoman.
Because Gorman and her co-counsel Stephen Herrick did not raise the issue, she said they do not expect to carry it forward for an appeal. Instead, she said, they may ask an Albany County Court judge to exonerate Johnston's bail.
At a hearing Wednesday designed to determine Johnston's bail, the court instead agreed to stay the bail, Gorman said.
READ MORE:
NY Bail Reform Would Be Curbed Under GOP Proposals in State Legislature
Prosecutors Brace for Sweeping Change as NY Criminal Justice Reforms Take Effect
No Plans to Delay, Change NY's New Criminal Justice Laws, Senate Leader Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250