AG James Sues Trump Administration Over New Yorkers' Ban From Trusted Traveler Program
The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court, claimed that the policy specifically targeted the state and its residents over a new "Green Light" law, which took effect in December and allows undocumented immigrants to apply for driver's licenses.
February 10, 2020 at 02:22 PM
2 minute read
State Attorney General Letitia James on Monday sued the Trump administration to halt its decision last week to ban thousands of New Yorkers from enrolling in federal programs intended to expedite international travel.
The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court, claimed that the policy specifically targeted the state and its residents over a new "Green Light" law, which took effect in December and allows undocumented immigrants to apply for driver's licenses.
In a 30-page complaint, James said the move to revoke New York's participation in the Trusted Traveler programs was not tethered to any legitimate federal interest and stripped the state of its guarantee of equal sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment.
"New Yorkers will not be held hostage by an Administration intent on restraining the sovereign rights of states, while it simultaneously enacts discriminatory policies across the country," James said in a press release announcing the lawsuit.
"The Trump administration's new policy not only negatively impacts travelers, workers, commerce, and our economy, but it jeopardizes public safety. No one should ever use our nation's security as a political weapon, let alone the commander-in-chief," she said.
James and Gov. Andrew Cuomo had promised litigation last week in response to the policy, which Trump administration officials defended as necessary to screen travelers with criminal histories. The leaders, however, called the move an act of political retribution designed to punish New York over its support of the Green Light law and other policies meant to protect undocumented immigrants.
The lawsuit names the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and their acting heads, as defendants, and seeks injunctive relief, including a delay in its implementation, as well as an order declaring the ban unconstitutional.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Under Trump 2.0 Likely to Take More 'Measured' Enforcement Approach, Observers Say
Decision of the Day: Attorney in Social Security Case Awarded Fees, But Must Pay Client Refund Under Equal Access to Justice Act
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-60
- 2California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 3Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 4Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 5Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250