With Closing Arguments Slated for Tuesday, Avenatti Will Not Testify in Extortion Trial
U.S. District Judge Paul G. Gardephe of the Southern District of New York had ruled earlier in the day that if Avenatti were to testify, he could be cross-examined about "highly relevant" allegations that he had stolen from former clients.
February 10, 2020 at 03:33 PM
3 minute read
Michael Avenatti will not take the stand in his extortion trial, as the criminal case against the embattled attorney and outspoken critic of President Donald Trump is expected to move to closing arguments Tuesday.
Scott Srebnick, a Miami-based lawyer who is defending Avenatti against charges that he tried to shake down Nike Inc. for more than $20 million, told a Manhattan federal judge Monday that the scope of the defense case is expected to be "very limited" and will include "no witnesses."
U.S. District Judge Paul G. Gardephe of the Southern District of New York had ruled earlier in the day that if Avenatti were to testify, he could be cross-examined about "highly relevant" allegations that he had stolen from former clients, including adult film star Stormy Daniels, who had accused Trump of engaging in an extramarital affair in 2006. Trump has forcefully denied that allegation.
Gardephe had excluded any references to other criminal charges pending against Avenatti, but said that prosecutors would be allowed to elicit descriptions about his behavior toward past clients.
When asked whether he had carefully considered his decision, Avenatti responded: "In light of the court's prior rulings, yes."
Prosecutors from the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office have alleged that Avenatti was facing mounting personal and professional debts when he threatened to go public with damaging information about Nike, unless the company agreed to pay him between $15 million and $25 million to conduct an internal investigation of the sports apparel giant.
Avenatti has maintained his innocence, claiming that he was simply representing a client who brought the accusations against Nike to light.
The government rested its case Monday, after laying out about a week and a half of evidence and testimony to a jury of six men and six women. Gardephe told the panel that he expects both sides to begin making their closing arguments Tuesday.
Avenatti is charged separately in New York with skimming money from Daniels' book deal, and also faces a sprawling indictment in California for allegedly stealing from his former clients. He has pleaded not guilty to all the charges and remains in jail pending trial, following his arrest last month in Los Angeles for bail violations.
Read More:
Prosecutors Say Avenatti 'Sold Out' Client in Shakedown of Nike in Opening Statement
Jury to Hear About Michael Avenatti's Debts, Stormy Daniels Case in Nike Extortion Trial
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250