Patterson Belknap Boosts Revenue Amid Litigation Gains, Management Focus
The firm saw double-digit revenue gains while pursuing a greater emphasis on business operations and development.
February 11, 2020 at 01:20 PM
5 minute read
Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler co-chair and managing partner Lisa Cleary said the firm's investments in its C-suite and new professional and business development initiatives are paying off, helping drive double-digit revenue growth and the firm's best-ever financial year.
The firm saw gross revenue grow 10.4% in 2019 to $215.1 million, up from $194.9 million in 2019. Revenue per lawyer was up 10.9%, to nearly $1.2 million in 2019, and profits per equity partner rose 8.8% to $1.8 million.
Cleary said the firm thrived on litigation work in 2019—the firm went to trial eight times and has 17 more trials scheduled for this year.
Among its litigation highlights, Patterson Belknap lawyers defended Johnson & Johnson against asbestos-related mesothelioma claims tied to talcum powder, defended Sony against a patent infringement claim and represented Abbott Laboratories in an anti-counterfeiting case. It also represented an Insys board member in litigation tied to the opioid crisis. The firm was one of the largest unsecured creditors in the pharmaceutical company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing last year.
Cleary also attributed the firm's success to a strategic plan that has shifted its focus further toward developing its business operations side.
"At the end of 2018, we made a conscious decision to strengthen how the firm operates as a business," Cleary said, noting the firm moved away from a board of directors governance model to hiring C-suite executives. The firm in September 2019 hired chief operating officer Sally King, who was former COO of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and a business leader at Dentons, Clifford Chance and Cooley.
Additionally, Patterson Belknap hired a chief of business development, a chief of finance, and a chief of people, diversity and professional development.
"We wanted to devote more resources on a full-time basis to these important areas of helping lawyers develop to their maximum potential," Cleary said.
Patterson Belknap ended 2019 with 181 attorneys, one fewer than the previous year. It grew its equity tier by one partner last year, bringing the total to 47.
For 2020 Cleary said the firm would continue to invest in growth on its business and professional development side, by strengthening staffing under the chief financial officer, looking at pricing and alternative fee arrangements and being more strategic about budgeting, and staffing client matters.
Cleary said the firm has already started to prioritize cross-selling opportunities, which will continue to be a focus for the coming year. While Patterson Belknap's exempt organization practice group was another high performer in 2019, Cleary said she still sees it as an area of growth in the coming year, while the white-collar practice remains an area of opportunity for the firm.
Patterson Belknap is open to "measured but thoughtful" head count growth in the coming year, Cleary said, but any hires in 2020 would be vetted for a culture fit. The firm is a one-office shop, with offices on Sixth Avenue in Midtown, and has no plans to change.
"We're a single-office law firm, and we want to keep it that way," she said. "We know everyone who walks our halls by first and last name. That's a very special aspect of the firm."
The firm also plans to invest more in programs to keep its attorneys happy, healthy and high-performing. It kicked off 2020 by announcing an amended parental leave policy in which each attorney, without regard to primary caregiver, receives 22 weeks of paid leave. Cleary said that two male associates have already taken extended time off.
"This was a significant financial decision on the firm's part, but the management committee concluded it was critical to our efforts to attract and retain the best and brightest," she said.
Note: This story has been updated to reflect that the firm does not categorize any partners as non-equity partners.
The 2019 financial figures reported in this story are preliminary. ALM will report finalized data for the Am Law 200 in The American Lawyer's May and June issues.
|Read More
NYC Jury Adds $300M in Punitive Damages to Verdict in Lawsuit Linking Talc Products to Mesothelioma
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250